Alternating Series: Evaluate E(n = 1) to Infinity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the alternating series E(n = 1) to infinity for the expression ((-1)^(n+1))/n^6. Participants are exploring the requirements for the series to be in a proper form for evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of expressing the series in a "proper form" and discussing the implications of the exponent on the terms. There are attempts to clarify the conditions for the alternating series test and considerations for absolute convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various perspectives on the need for a specific form of the series. Some participants suggest that the alternating nature of the series is sufficient, while others emphasize the importance of meeting the criteria for convergence tests. There is no explicit consensus on the necessity of the "proper form."

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific conditions required for the alternating series test and the absolute convergence test, indicating that participants are navigating through the definitions and requirements of convergence in the context of alternating series.

vigintitres
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



E(n = 1) to infinity ((-1)^n+1)/n^6


Homework Equations


This needs to be in the proper form with the exponent on an being n - 1 not n + 1


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to get the problem into the proper for to evaluate it as an alternating series
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what you mean by "standard form". If you're just trying to prove that the sum converges, the alternating series test requires that you show

(1) [tex]a_n[/tex] is strictly alternating (i.e. [tex]a_{n+1}=-a_n[/tex])

(2) [tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = 0[/tex]

(3) [tex]|a_{n+1}| \leq |a_n|[/tex]

EDIT: You could also use direct comparison to show that the sum is absolutely convergent.
 
I don't see why you need a "proper form". I mean it is alternating signs after all. If you wanted the exponent to be n-1 you could just replace n+1 with n-1 since you're just dividing by (-1)^2 = 1. But there really is no point in doing that.

Use the absolute convergence test first when dealing with alternating series. You'll see that in some cases such as this one, using it determines convergence/divergence easily.
 
But if you really must have "proper form", (-1)n+1= (-1)n-1+ 2= (-1)n+1(-1)2= (-1)n-1 because (-1)2= 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K