Alternative to Griffiths Introduction to Electrodynamics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges faced by students using Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" in advanced Electricity and Magnetism courses. Users express frustration with Griffiths' reliance on approximations and vague explanations, particularly in chapters 4 and 6. Recommendations for alternative texts include Wangsness' "Electromagnetic Fields" and Jackson's work, which may provide a more rigorous approach to the subject matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Electricity and Magnetism concepts from introductory courses.
  • Familiarity with Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" (3rd Edition).
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic theory and mathematical techniques used in physics.
  • Experience with academic physics coursework at the upper undergraduate level.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Wangsness' "Electromagnetic Fields" for a more concrete approach to E&M.
  • Study Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for advanced rigor in electromagnetic theory.
  • Review specific chapters in Griffiths to identify and clarify challenging concepts.
  • Research supplementary resources or textbooks that focus on practical applications of electromagnetism.
USEFUL FOR

Students in upper-level Electricity and Magnetism courses, educators seeking alternative teaching materials, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of electromagnetic theory beyond Griffiths' approach.

Vance-Turner
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I hope I am posting this question in the correct forum.

I am in the second course in an upper level Electricity and Magnetism sequence (E&M II). We are using Griffith's Introduction to Electrodynamics as in the first course in the sequence. We covered chapters 1-3, 5, 7, and some of 8 in the first course; and I followed Griffiths well. In the second course, we have done chapter 4 and started in on chapter 6; and I am lost, completely. Griffiths is using so many "approximations" and hand-wavy explanations. Does anyone have suggestions for electricity and magnetism texts that are more concrete; or is the nature of the subject riddled with approximations that break down in new situations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's always Jackson. Seeing that might make change your opinion on approximations.
 
Vance-Turner said:
Griffiths is using so many "approximations" and hand-wavy explanations.

Welcome to physics. It's only going to get dirtier from here on out :wink:
 
Can you give an example of the kind of passage that bothers you?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There's always Jackson. Seeing that might make change your opinion on approximations.

second this.

be careful what you wish for. On the other hand if it isn't for a class there is no one to hold the hand to the fire so the rigor isn't that big of a deal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K