Alternative to 'Introduction to Quantum Mechanics' by Griffiths

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by students using a specific Quantum Mechanics textbook, which is praised for its colloquial writing style but criticized for its abrupt introduction of complex concepts like Schrödinger's equation without adequate explanation. Participants express difficulty in solving the problems presented, noting a lack of example problems and a desire for more accessible learning resources. Recommendations for alternative texts include Dicke and Wittke's book, which offers manageable problems, and Nouredine Zettili's "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications," noted for its thoroughness. Additionally, Gary Bowman's book is suggested as a helpful supplement due to its similar notation to Griffiths' text. The importance of a solid foundation in linear algebra, calculus, and differential equations is emphasized to aid comprehension of the physics concepts. Overall, while Griffiths' book is recognized for its problem-solving approach, users are encouraged to seek supplementary materials to enhance their understanding.
Shukie
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
We just started the course on Quantum Mechanics and this is the 'official' textbook we're using. I have heard many people speak fondly of this book and so far I do like that the author writes in a colloquial style. However, reading it, I feel dumb. Schrodingers equation is just thrown out there right at the start without any explanation or introduction and it seems like I'm just expected to understand it. Problems are also difficult and I can't really solve most of them. Example problems are far and few in between. I like to self-learn and I'm having a hard time doing that with this book. Anyone know of an alternative? Preferably one with lots of worked out problems.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Shukie said:
We just started the course on Quantum Mechanics and this is the 'official' textbook we're using. I have heard many people speak fondly of this book and so far I do like that the author writes in a colloquial style. However, reading it, I feel dumb. Schrodingers equation is just thrown out there right at the start without any explanation or introduction and it seems like I'm just expected to understand it. Problems are also difficult and I can't really solve most of them. Example problems are far and few in between. I like to self-learn and I'm having a hard time doing that with this book. Anyone know of an alternative? Preferably one with lots of worked out problems.

I remember that Dicke and Wittke had many problems that are doable. I used it as a confidence builder when learning quantum mechanics.
 
I understand your difficulties, as that is what I'm suing right now, as well. At first problems were quite difficult, but I feel that I have developed a very strong grasp of the concepts, after struggling to figure out problems on my own. Now I feel fluent in the language Griffiths uses, and the arguments flow smoothly in my mind. If you do find an alternative, I would recommend at least keeping Griffiths as a supplement, as he is pretty thourough.
 
Wishe Deom said:
I understand your difficulties, as that is what I'm suing right now, as well.

Geez, people will sue over anything!
 
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199228930/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by gary bowman would be a great supplement to griffiths, especially since the notation is very similar between the two books. bowman's book isn't really a textbook and is written almost specifically to help supplement other textbooks and courses. there is also a solutions manual for griffiths' book, but use caution as you don't want to rely on constantly looking up the solution.

another thing that i think would help with this text would be to review your linear algebra, calculus, and differential equations notes and textbooks. having a solid recollection and understanding of these subjects helps you concentrate on the physics principles without getting lost in the calculations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shukie said:
Schrodingers equation is just thrown out there right at the start without any explanation or introduction and it seems like I'm just expected to understand it.

also, don't worry about not understanding schrodinger's equation from the get go. this text is more getting you used to being able to work with it and use it to solve problems, and not to be able to derive it. griffiths' book is really great in that it helps you get dirty with working through a bunch of calculations and problems, letting you learn the more abstract theory later.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
638
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Back
Top