Aluminium vs Copper in power lines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Aluminium is preferred over copper for power lines primarily due to its lower cost and lighter weight, despite having lower conductivity. One kilogram of aluminium can carry twice as much electricity as one kilogram of copper due to its lower density, which allows for a larger cross-sectional area when equal weights are compared. The resistivity of copper is 1.68 x 10-8 Ω·m, while aluminium's resistivity is 2.86 x 10-8 Ω·m. Understanding the relationship between resistivity, conductivity, and density is crucial for evaluating the performance of these materials in electrical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistivity and conductivity
  • Familiarity with material density concepts
  • Basic knowledge of electrical resistance and conductance formulas
  • Awareness of the economic factors influencing material selection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of cross-sectional area on electrical conductivity
  • Explore the economic factors affecting the price of metals used in power lines
  • Learn about the applications of aluminium and copper in electrical engineering
  • Investigate advancements in materials science that improve conductivity
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, materials scientists, and professionals involved in power line construction and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Monosandalus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question concerning the use of aluminium in power lines. I know that it's lighter than copper and thus cheaper, which is the main reason we prefer it above copper. But in fact alumunium has a lower conductivity than copper. Why is it then that one kg of aluminium can carry twice as much electricity as one kg of copper ? This seems to be contradictory to me.

Thank you :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here's some information that should be useful in the process of considering the question objectively:

Resistivity, \rho_e, \mathrm{(\Omega \cdot m)}:
Copper: 1.68 \times 10^{-8}
Aluminum: 2.86 \times 10^{-8}​

Conductivity, \sigma, \mathrm{(S / m)}:
Copper: 5.96 \times 10^{7}
Aluminum: 3.50 \times 10^{7}​

Density \rho_m, \mathrm{(g/cm^3)} [Edit: corrected copy-paste error and a typo.]
Copper: 8.96
Aluminum: 2.70
By the way, resistivity and conductivity are not independent. They are merely reciprocals. \rho_e = 1/\sigma. Both resisitivity and conductivity are given in terms of spatial dimensions, such as unit cross-sectional area and unit length.

If A is the cross sectional area of the conductor, \ell is the conductor's length, then

Resistance, r = \frac{\rho_e \ell}{A}

Conductance, G = \frac{1}{r} = \frac{\sigma A}{\ell}

Mass, m = A \ell \rho_m
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
Density ρm,(g/cm2) \rho_m, (g/cm^2)
Copper: 2.70
Aluminum: 8.96

You got those swapped. Copper is the higher density material.

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
Think about two wires of equal length . One made from 1 kg of Copper and the other from 1 kg of Aluminium .
 
And the price of metals depends on many factors besides just their densities (their weights). Lead is not cheaper than silver because it is lighter (it isn't: lead is heavier than silver); it's cheaper because it is more abundant and easier to extract.
 
rbelli1 said:
You got those swapped. Copper is the higher density material.

BoB
Thanks. It was a copy-paste error. Correction made.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K