Am I cut out to take grad/postgrad physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joelio36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cut Physics
AI Thread Summary
Struggling to retain information from previous modules is a common experience among students, particularly when there is a significant gap between studying the material and applying it. The "use it or lose it" principle highlights that without regular engagement, knowledge can fade. It's emphasized that understanding concepts deeply is more beneficial than rote memorization, as this facilitates the application of knowledge in new contexts. As students progress, they will revisit foundational topics, which helps reinforce their learning. Ultimately, determining readiness for graduate studies should come after assessing personal interests and enjoyment in the subject matter. The analogy of riding a bicycle illustrates that skills may feel rusty after a break, but with practice, they can be revitalized.
joelio36
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Hello.

I'm currently taking my AS/A2 levels (in the UK, its the course before Bsc/Msc). I am finding it ok, and have scored consistently high (80% being an A, with my averages around 90%).

Its not the work I'm struggling with, its rememembering old stuff!
Its 6 months since I last looked at the previous module, we don't need to, I am just trying to keep on top of things. I can remember most of it, but not all of it.

Is this the same or everyone or should I remember all of the course??
Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "use it or lose it" rule applies here. It's pretty easy to forget stuff when you're not working with it on a regular basis. Of course, as you progress in your studies you'll find yourself returning to the fundamentals more and more. What's most important, I find, it that you develop a clear understanding of the concepts rather than memorizing them - that way you can apply them to new circumstances later on.

Whether or not you're cut out for grad school will be a conclusion you'll have to reach yourself towards the end of your undergraduate work. At this stage of the game, it's best just to figure out what kind of things your really enjoy studying.
 
It's like riding a bicycle, Once you had the knowledge to do it. You haven't done it in a couple of years, it's rusty like a mother****er and feels really awkward to boot. But when You get the rust off, get some new whistles and bells it's good to go.

Same in academia. I promise you.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top