https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/147417.jpg [Broken](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For the above problem, I simply take the curl of F and then take the cross product of it with the normal to the plane and integrate the whole thing with respect to the surface bounded by the plane.

Now, my solution is as followed with the help of computer program (save some manual calculation):

https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/147418.jpg [Broken]

Now, why is my value negative? am I doing something opposite? I thought I take the right normal vector. My n ds = dr/dx cross with dr/dy multiplied by dx and dy = <1, 1/2, 1> dxdy

So, the whole (double) integration is just

curl of F dotted with <1,1/2,1> dydx where y goes from 0 to 8-2x and then x from 0 to 4.

please help

thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Am I doing anything opposite to this problem related to verifying Stokes' theorem?

Loading...

Similar Threads - doing anything opposite | Date |
---|---|

B How do I solve this integral? | Jun 22, 2017 |

B Do all the peaks and valleys of f have f'=0 | Apr 22, 2017 |

I Do normal differentiation rules apply to vectors? | Apr 13, 2017 |

I Do limit and differential operators commute? | Feb 16, 2017 |

Does dx mean anything? | May 22, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**