Am I doing anything opposite to this problem related to verifying Stokes' theorem?

  • Thread starter albertlee
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0
https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/147417.jpg [Broken]

For the above problem, I simply take the curl of F and then take the cross product of it with the normal to the plane and integrate the whole thing with respect to the surface bounded by the plane.

Now, my solution is as followed with the help of computer program (save some manual calculation):

https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/147418.jpg [Broken]

Now, why is my value negative? am I doing something opposite? I thought I take the right normal vector. My n ds = dr/dx cross with dr/dy multiplied by dx and dy = <1, 1/2, 1> dxdy

So, the whole (double) integration is just
curl of F dotted with <1,1/2,1> dydx where y goes from 0 to 8-2x and then x from 0 to 4.


please help

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2
0


never mind...

just figure out the -1/2 x of -1/2 x - yx should be +1/2 x.

ignore this thread then...
 

Related Threads on Am I doing anything opposite to this problem related to verifying Stokes' theorem?

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
810
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top