Studying Am I Doing Good? A Junior College Physics Aspirant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohammed Ayaz Quadri
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A first-year junior college student expresses a strong passion for physics and a desire to become a physicist, highlighting a talent for solving complex numerical problems but feeling pressure to be faster in thinking and problem-solving. The discussion emphasizes that while quick responses are often rewarded in educational settings, true understanding comes from deep engagement with concepts and the ability to approach problems from various perspectives. It's noted that not everyone grasps concepts immediately, and as long as the student is performing well academically and enjoying their studies, they are on the right track. The importance of arriving at correct answers and understanding the reasoning behind them is stressed, alleviating concerns about the need for instantaneous thinking.
Mohammed Ayaz Quadri
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
I am in First Year Junior College (almost at its end). I literally love Physics. I want to become a Physicist. I want to be capable of explaining any phenomenon in terms of Physics. I love solving complex, interlinked numericals. I am one of the fastest one to solve them. But I feel I am not fast enough if I keep my target in mind: Physicist. I need time to think. If I am clear with concepts, my thinking should be instantaneous. Sometimes I also don't like numericals. I have problems when working with a lot of variables, in naming them and making their equations. But I am definitely fast enough according the my academic level. Am I doing good? If no, please suggest me something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohammed Ayaz Quadri said:
I need time to think. If I am clear with concepts, my thinking should be instantaneous.
I don't believe this is the case. Often when thinking is "instantaneous" it's more the result of a drilled or memorized response to a given set of conditions. The people who tend to be the most successful in physics are the ones who can view problems from different angles. They think deeply about each problem and are able to recognize the different concepts at play and apply logic to them in a formal way they can articulate.

That said, testing often rewards quick responses. So you do have to be able to arrive at answers in a timely fashion to successfully get through just about any educational system. But just because you're not arriving at them instantaneously is not a reason to believe you'll struggle or that you don't understand. What's more important is that when you do arrive at the answer, it's correct, and you know how you got it.
Sometimes I also don't like numericals. I have problems when working with a lot of variables, in naming them and making their equations. But I am definitely fast enough according the my academic level. Am I doing good? If no, please suggest me something.

Not everyone gets things immediately. If you're doing well in your classes and enjoying your studies, you're doing as well as you need to be. I think it's a common misconception that you need to be working above whatever level you're at to be successful.
 
Thank you sir. Thats a relief.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
386
Replies
32
Views
377
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
618
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top