Am I Hallucinating? (confusion in geometric algebra)

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,385
Reaction score
2,746
I'm learning geometric algebra. There is a very simple statement which I think is wrong. But it must be right, because all the experts say so. Arrg!

The only properties used are

1a = a1 = a

aa = 1

if b<>a then ab = -baTheir claim is that abcdabcd = -1.

Let's see:

aa = 1

abab = -abba = -aa = -1

abcabc = -abacbc = ababcc = abab = -1

abcdabcd = -abcadbcd = abcabdcd = -abcabcdd = -abcabc = --1 = 1

But the experts say abcdabcd = -1. See for yourself at
http://geocalc.clas.asu.edu/pdf-preAdobe8/ZBW_I_QM.pdf, eqn 10 and 11

This can't be. To reduce the 4D case to the 3D case there have to be an odd number of swaps. They are of opposite signs and nonzero. They can't possibly be equal.

Elsewhere they say that abcabc and abab equal -1.

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are ignoring Eqs. (7)-(8) which basically tell you that your 4D space has signature (+,-,-,-). In other words, this means that you are working on ℝ1,3 and not on ℝ4, thus, using your notation, aa=1 and bb=cc=dd=-1.

Another thing worth noticing is that those vectors a,b,c,d are not arbitrary vectors: they are the basis vectors of your 4D space, and b,c,d by definition square to -1. In the context of that paper abcd represents the pseudoscalar of the space. Whether the square of the pseudoscalar is positive or negative (or zero) depends on the metric of the space.

It shall also be pointed out that ab=-ba is not true in general, but only when a,b are orthogonal vectors, which is expressed in Eq. (8).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Hornbein
mnb96 said:
I think you are ignoring Eqs. (7)-(8) which basically tell you that your 4D space has signature (+,-,-,-). In other words, this means that you are working on ℝ1,3 and not on ℝ4, thus, using your notation, aa=1 and bb=cc=dd=-1.

Another thing worth noticing is that those vectors a,b,c,d are not arbitrary vectors: they are the basis vectors of your 4D space, and b,c,d by definition square to -1. In the context of that paper abcd represents the pseudoscalar of the space. Whether the square of the pseudoscalar is positive or negative (or zero) depends on the metric of the space.

It shall also be pointed out that ab=-ba is not true in general, but only when a,b are orthogonal vectors, which is expressed in Eq. (8).

Aha, that's it. I had the wrong space.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top