AM Modulation: Understanding Envelopes and Detection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khaled Kord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulation Signals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of Amplitude Modulation (AM), specifically focusing on the mathematical representation of AM signals, the concept of envelopes, and the differences between various signal functions. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical implications, and questions regarding the modulation process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the proof behind the equation for AM modulation, specifically how adding one and multiplying by a trigonometric function results in an envelope.
  • Another participant suggests that the "1" in the equation represents a DC component, indicating that the envelope is formed by the sum of the main message function and this DC component.
  • It is noted that the main message function operates at audio frequencies, while the carrier frequency is in the radio frequency range.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumption that the peaks of the modulated signal are tangent to the main signal, questioning the basis for this characterization and the potential for intersections at arbitrary points.
  • A later reply outlines features of AM detection, including Automatic Gain Control, peak followers, and AC coupling, which are said to help regenerate the original AC modulation waveform.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the characterization of the envelope and the mathematical representation of AM signals. There is no consensus on the proof of the envelope formation or the assumptions regarding the relationship between the main signal and the modulated signal.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the amplitude restrictions of the modulation function and the implications of the envelope characterization remain unresolved. The discussion includes various interpretations of the mathematical relationships involved in AM modulation.

Khaled Kord
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i just had my first Signals processing Lecture, during AM modulation part my prof said that:
V_AM(t) = (V_main(t) + 1) * V_Carrier
while V_Carrier = sin (omega * t)

1-is there a proof that we get the envelop of a function by adding one then multiplying by some trig value?
2- what's the difference between main message function m(t) = A Cos(omega *t) and the term V(t) = A Sin(omega *t) ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A quick google of the topic was somewhat helpful with a diagram that it showed. To answer the first question, it appears if a carrier signal with steady amplitude is received, this will be seen (after demodulation) as a steady DC signal with zero ac (audio frequency) signal. The "1" in your equation is some arbitrary ## V_{DC} ##, and ## V_{AM}(t) ## is the r-f signal. The envelope is the sum of ## V_{main}(t) ## ,which is the ac (audio) signal, and ## V_{DC} ##. When the signal is demodulated, the envelope including the ## V_{DC} ## is recovered (e.g. with a half-wave rectifier), but that demodulated waveform can always be put into an ac coupled circuit where the ## V_{DC} ## gets blocked by the capacitor of the C-R (ac coupled) circuit and the ac (audio) portion of the envelope remains without the ## V_{DC} ##. I am not a communications or r-f expert, but I think I correctly answered your first question, at least in explaining where the equation comes from. Hopefully this was helpful. editing... To answer your second question, the main message function ## V_{main}(t) ## ## \ ## is at audio frequencies. Your "omega" in that equation will be limited to 60 kHz or thereabouts (i.e. ## 20 \ Hz<f_{audio}<10 \ kHz ## and ## \omega=2 \pi f ##). The carrier "omega" for ## V_{carrier}(t) ## meanwhile is in the Megahertz(radio frequency) range.
 
Last edited:
Khaled Kord said:
1-is there a proof that we get the envelop of a function by adding one then multiplying by some trig value?
If the modulation, V_main(t), is restricted in amplitude to be between +/–1 then, when the one is added, the modulation becomes unipolar. After the multiplication by the sinewave carrier the phase of the modulated carrier is never reversed, so the envelope of the signal peaks follows the modulation amplitude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
Baluncore said:
If the modulation, V_main(t), is restricted in amplitude to be between +/–1 then, when the one is added, the modulation becomes unipolar. After the multiplication by the sinewave carrier the phase of the modulated carrier is never reversed, so the envelope of the signal peaks follows the modulation amplitude.

i think i didn't explain my first question right, i was asking that: who said the peaks of the V_AM(t) are tangent to the main signal V_main(t)? who said V_main(t) is an envelop? why doesn't it intersect in some arbitrary points like i draw in red (attached picture) ?
 

Attachments

  • phFor.png
    phFor.png
    35.6 KB · Views: 502
Three features of AM detection regenerate the original AC modulation waveform.
1. Automatic Gain Control stabilises the amplitude of the received AM signal.
2. A peak follower tracks and so detects the envelope of the AM signal.
3. The detected envelope is AC coupled.

Your diagram shows peaks with amplitude Ac+Am and Ac-Am, that is addition and subtraction, but AM is multiplication.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K