MHB Amber's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding linear first order ODEs

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Find the general solution of the differential equation?


(a) (x^2+1)dy/dx + xy = x

(b) (x + xy^2)dx + e^(x^2)ydy = 0

I don't think (b) is separable therefore there is no general solution. Is that correct to assume that because of the (x + xy^2) in brackets? Also I am not sure how to go about doing part (a).

Thanks! :)

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Amber,

We are asked to find the general solution to the following ODEs:

a) $$\left(x^2+1 \right)\frac{dy}{dx}+xy=x$$

One way to proceed is to separate the variables to obtain:

$$\frac{1}{1-y}\,dy=\frac{x}{x^2+1}\,dx$$

We should note that in doing so, we are losing the trivial solution $y\equiv1$.

We may integrate as follows:

$$-\int\frac{1}{y-1}\,dy=\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{2x}{x^2+1}\,dx$$

$$-\ln|y-1|=\frac{1}{2}\ln\left(x^2+1 \right)+C$$

Applying logarithmic properties, we may write (where we express the constant of integration as the natural log of a positive constant with no loss of generality):

$$\ln\left|\frac{1}{y-1} \right|=\ln\left(C\sqrt{x^2+1} \right)$$

Equating log arguments, we obtain:

$$\frac{1}{y-1}=C\sqrt{x^2+1}$$

Note: because of the absolute value of the argument on the left, the parameter $C$ may now be any non-zero value.

Inverting both sides, we obtain:

$$y-1=\frac{1}{C\sqrt{x^2+1}}$$

$$y(x)=\frac{1}{C\sqrt{x^2+1}}+1$$

We may redefine the parameter $C$ such that it is the inverse of that given above, and we may allow it to be zero to incorporate the trivial solution we lost during the separation of variables, and so we may state:

$$y(x)=\frac{C}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}+1$$

Another way we could solve the given ODE is to divide through by $x^2+1>0$ to obtain the linear ODE in standard form:

$$\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{x}{x^2+1}y=\frac{x}{x^2+1}$$

Computing the integrating factor, we find:

$$\mu(x)=e^{\int\frac{x}{x^2+1}\,dx}=\sqrt{x^2+1}$$

Multiplying through by this factor, the ODE becomes:

$$\sqrt{x^2+1}\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}y=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}$$

Observing the left side is now the differentiation of a product, we may write:

$$\frac{d}{dx}\left(\sqrt{x^2+1}y \right)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}$$

Now we may integrate:

$$\int\,d\left(\sqrt{x^2+1}y \right)=\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{2x}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}\,dx$$

Computing the anti-derivatives, we obtain:

$$\sqrt{x^2+1}y=\sqrt{x^2+1}+C$$

Dividing through by $$\sqrt{x^2+1}$$ we find:

$$y(x)=\frac{C}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}+1$$

b) $$\left(x+xy^2 \right)\,dx+e^{x^2}y\,dy=0$$

We may separate variables to obtain:

$$\frac{y}{y^2+1}\,dy=-e^{-x^2}x\,dx$$

We may integrate as follows:

$$\int\frac{2y}{y^2+1}\,dy=\int e^{-x^2}(-2x)\,dx$$

Computing the anti-derivatives, we find the implicit solution:

$$\ln\left(y^2+1 \right)=e^{-x^2}+C$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top