Amplifying a He-Ne Laser: Tips and Guidelines for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeNe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on amplifying a He-Ne laser to increase its power for cutting applications, particularly in art and woodworking. The user expresses concerns about safety and knowledge gaps in laser amplification, seeking guidance on how to proceed. Suggestions include considering alternative laser types, such as CO2 or diode lasers, which are more efficient for cutting tasks. Additionally, resources like the alt.lasers Usenet group and Sam Goldwasser's website are recommended for further information and community support. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the challenges and considerations in enhancing laser capabilities for specific practical uses.
HeNe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework

Hello
I am working on laser amplification(first time) for a He-Ne laser (160 cm ,80 watt)
But i don't know how to start the study because i am afraid of harming the device
I have so many ideas in my mind for example :
Making a q-switched laser ,or make anther laser and the pumping part of it is the He-Ne laser
i need to amplify it to reach 200 watt...
please any idea or where should i start

it is very important HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums HeNe!

I've never heard of HeNe lasers at the power levels you are talking about. What is it you ultimately want to use the laser beam for? It might be better to use something other than a HeNe.
 
thank you for your welcome

i am working in cutting biz (plastic, wood) and i used a He-Ne laser

my main work is in art
and now i need to amplify the power of my laser so i can cut 1 deism of silver

i can't by any other device because i have so many loans on me [because of the sickens of my father]

and these is the main reason of trying to amplify the power of my laser...
and i have a Friend that told me about this website.. so i will try to remember my old physics courses
i am 55
and it is hard to remember every thing
 
From a quick internet search, I have the impression that C02 lasers are more common for woodcutting. It might be possible that diode lasers can also be used for this. As diode lasers are about the most efficient lasers available, they would be lower cost for a given power level.

There may be a few people here at Physics Forums who can give good advice on this, but I'll suggest you try asking at the usenet group alt.lasers :
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lasers/topics
(You'll need either to create a google account -- it's free -- to post to alt.lasers, or have some other way to access usenet groups)

A number of regulars in alt.lasers build lasers as a hobby, and the "guru" of the group is Sam Goldwasser. His website has a little information on laser cutting with C02 lasers:
http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/laserco2.htm#co2mcwl
(Read the sections on "small wood cutting lasers" and "large wood cutting lasers")

You can also poke around on Sam's site wherever it mentions cutting and wood:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=cutting+wood+site:repairfaq.org&btnG=Search

Good luck!

Mark

p.s. I am wondering if your setup uses the HeNe strictly as a visible alignment beam, and the real cutting is done by a C02 or other high-power laser?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top