An impractical bridge, but would it work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dylman3003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a complete elliptical design for a balsa wood bridge, questioning why such designs are rarely implemented. It highlights that while a full ellipse could theoretically redistribute forces more effectively, practical considerations like material weight and structural integrity often lead to the use of half-ellipses. The conversation references the Quebec bridge as an example of completed elliptical structures, emphasizing that self-weight is a critical factor in bridge design. The participants agree that while a full ellipse may work, the trade-off in material and support requirements makes half-ellipses more practical for real-world applications. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the balance between theoretical efficiency and practical construction constraints in bridge engineering.
Dylman3003
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What I'm asking is this: I'm researching bridge designs for a balsa wood bridge, but I'm wondering why that the ellipse of a curve of a bridge support system is never completed?

I understand that bridge that had an ellipse bisected by a roadway would be impractical in reality, but would it be more efficient than a half ellipse in my case where I'm building a balsa wood bridge
(Disclaimer: This is not homework)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An arch or sphere or what have you is strongest when the pressure is pushing inward. The structure is being compacted into itself.

If the pressure is outward, an arch or sphere isn't as strong.

Gravity only pushes straight down. That's pushing inward on the top half of an ellipse and outward on the bottom half.
 
But if the ellipse is completed, shouldn't the force downward be redistributed as a compression force against the top when (the load is centered) the bottom of the ellipse pulls downwards? In effect, shouldn't this new sideways force on the top directly compress against that of the top trying to pull downwards?...

i may have to use a lap joint than a perfect butt joint for this statement though
 
First of all, welcome to Physics Forums.

but I'm wondering why that the ellipse of a curve of a bridge support system is never completed?

Who said they are never completed?

Take a look at the picture of the Quebec bridge in post#13 in this thread.

You will see two fully completed "ellipses" supporting a centre drop-in "half" ellipse span.

Self weight is the controlling factor in most bridges since the weights (densities) of real materials needed to withstand traffic loads and environmental degradation far exceeds that of balsa. Self weight is usually (by far) the largest load imposed on a bridge.

Given the above you can immediately see why saving half the material is often attractive.

What you are describing would work - a ring structure will span between a couple of supports.

What bridge builders are doing by cutting it in half is to replace the forces that would be present (in a full ring) at the cut with forces supplied by the supports. This replaces the weight of half the ring with supports forces.

Of course to supply these (quite enormous) support forces can only be done at suitable sites.

Does this help?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top