Analogies for internal resistance and emf

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of internal resistance in a source of electromotive force (emf) and its effect on potential difference. Participants explore analogies, particularly using water flow, to clarify these concepts and examine the relationship between current, potential, and electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that internal resistance makes it harder to push charges to a higher potential, questioning why the potential at that height should not remain the same.
  • Another participant agrees with the water fountain analogy, suggesting that internal resistance decreases current, leading to a lower height and thus a lower potential.
  • A participant raises a question about the molecular level, suggesting that a decrease in current due to internal resistance might weaken the electric field associated with the potential difference.
  • Another participant challenges the relevance of the molecular level, stating that potential difference exists regardless of current flow and concludes that a lower potential difference implies a lower electric field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the effectiveness of analogies and the implications of internal resistance on potential and electric fields. There is no consensus on the relationship between current, potential difference, and molecular-level effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the implications of internal resistance on potential difference and electric fields, leaving some assumptions and definitions open to interpretation.

The_Lobster
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm trying to fully grasp why the potential drops when an internal resistance is present in a source of emf. At first I thought that yes it would be harder to "push" the charges to the higher potential, but once there, why shouldn't the higher potential be the same as before? Just as if a water pump was to push water to the top of a fountain, if there was resistance in this path, it would go slower, but the top of the fountain would still be at he same height, and the potential energy of the water the same once it reaches the top?

Please help me in constructing a proper analogy for this...

J

edit: could one think of this way: the internal resistance decreases current, thus in the water fountain analogy, the water doesn't reach the same height it would do had it not been for the internal resistance, and since the height is lower, the potential is lower.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi The_Lobster! :smile:
The_Lobster said:
edit: could one think of this way: the internal resistance decreases current, thus in the water fountain analogy, the water doesn't reach the same height it would do had it not been for the internal resistance, and since the height is lower, the potential is lower.

Yes, that's correct …

in the water analogy, you could fix the height, but in emf there is no height (or anything else) to fix, so you end up with a lower potential (which in the case of water means lower height). :wink:

(ok, now try using a water analogy to explain energy storage in a capacitor! :biggrin:)
 
Great! Thanks! :D

On a molecular level, could one say that since the current decreases (due to the internal resistance), the electric field on which the potential difference is based becomes weaker?
 
hmm … not sure what the molecular level has to do with it (and there's a potential difference whether there's a current flowing or not) …

if the potential difference is lower, then the field must be lower. :smile:
 
Right! Thank you again! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K