Analogy between fluid dynamics and electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the analogy between fluid dynamics and electromagnetism, particularly how the velocity flow field correlates with the magnetic vector potential and vorticity with the magnetic field. While there is a strong analogy between the equations governing magnetic fields and vorticity, the correspondence is not perfect, as certain relationships in electromagnetism do not exist in fluid dynamics. The conversation highlights the lack of systematic exploration of this analogy, despite its intriguing implications, such as in general relativity where vorticity relates to the gravitomagnetic field. References to relevant papers suggest that in specific cases, fluid equations may align with Maxwell's equations. Overall, the analogy presents interesting parallels but remains limited in its broader applicability.
komdu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've recently heard of an analogy between fluid dynamics and electromagnetism in which the velocity flow field is identified with the magnetic vector potential, (and therefore the vorticity is identified with the magnetic field), and the vector \omega \times v is identified with the electric field.

I'm curious as to how far this analogy goes but haven't had much luck finding a completely systematic exploration of this. It looks to me like this isn't a perfect correspondence, because, for example, there seems to be a relationship between magnetic field, electric field, and the vector potential that doesn't exist in electromagnetism.

5 days ago I asked a very similar question on Stack Exchange but it hasn't attracted any attention.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The analogy between the magnetic field ##\vec{B} = \vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A}## and the vorticity ##\vec{\omega} = \vec{\nabla}\times \vec{v}## is a very strong one; in fact in general relativity, the vorticity of the velocity field generating time-translations in space-time is identified with the gravitomagnetic field. But beyond that the analogy, as far as I know, is quite weak and as such you probably won't find any systematic exploration of it.
 
Many thanks. Do you know of any reasonable interpretation of E = B \times A in electromagnetism, which seems to arise from the definitions in the analogy?
 
Ah, those links are excellent. Following some references in the links you provided I've found this paper which seems to say (top of section III) that in the inviscid case some fluid equations precisely coincide with the Maxwell equations. I will need to read this carefully.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top