Physical degrees of freedom of an Electromagnetic field

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 5K views
Frank Castle
Messages
579
Reaction score
23
As I understand it, the classical source-free electric, ##\mathbf{E}## and magnetic, ##\mathbf{B}## wave equations are solved by solutions for the electric and magnetic fields of the following form: $$\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{E}_{0}e^{i (\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}-\omega t)}$$ $$\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{B}_{0}e^{i (\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}-\omega t)}$$

Naively counting the degrees of freedom (dof) at this point it would appear that the electromagnetic field has 6 dof.

However, is it correct that Maxwell's equations provide 4 constraints: $$\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{E}_{0}=0 \\ \mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{B}_{0}=0$$ $$\mathbf{E}_{0}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_{0}\varepsilon_{0}}}\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{B}_{0}$$ and $$\mathbf{B}_{0}=\sqrt{\mu_{0}\varepsilon_{0}}\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{E}_{0}$$
Thus reducing the number of physical dof to 2?!

If the above is correct what do these remaining dof correspond to? Are they simply the two possible polarisation (unit) vectors ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}##, ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}## that one can construct such that $$\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}=\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}=0$$ and $$\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}=\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}\\ \mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}=-\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}$$ and hence ##\lbrace\mathbf{k},\;\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1},\;\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}\rbrace## form an orthornormal basis, such that the general solutions for ##\mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{B}## are linear combinations of ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}## and ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}##?!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
marcusl said:

Ok cool.
So are the two physical degrees of freedom simply the choice of a component for the polarisation ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}##, and the choice of a component for the polarisation vector ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}## (in principle, they both have 3 dof, but the requirement that ##\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}=\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}=0## and ##\mathbf{\epsilon}_{1}\cdot\mathbf{\epsilon}_{2}=0##, reduces their dof to one each)?
 
marcusl said:
Yes, that's a nice way to put it.

Great. Thanks for your help.