Analysing 2 Material Cylinder w/ Internal Pressure 100 Units

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawndude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Error
AI Thread Summary
The analysis of a two-material cylinder under an internal pressure of 100 units reveals that the radial stress at the inner radius is 98.23 units, deviating by 2 to 3 percent from the expected value. The properties used include Young's moduli of 1e5 and 2e5, and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3 for both materials. A mesh convergence study indicates that while the solution converges, overly dense meshes can lead to stress values exceeding the applied pressure. The discussion highlights the importance of mesh density and the use of midside nodes in achieving accurate results. Overall, the findings suggest that mesh configuration significantly impacts stress calculations in the cylinder analysis.
Shawndude
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to analyse a two material cylinder glued together .The cylinder is subjected to internal pressure of 100 units. The problem i am facing is that the radial stress at the inner radius (where the internal pressure is applied) is not equal to the internal pressure.I.E. if the internal pressure is 100 units ,the radial stress at the inner radius is 98.23. It generally deviates by 2 to 3 percent.I am attaching a contour plot of the radial stress.
I have used the following properties;
young's modulus E1=1e5...E2=2e5
Poisson's ratio is 0.3 for both materials
Mesh properties: smart size no:1(fine)
free mesh
plane 182 has been used. It is a cylinder with zero height hence area has been defined.Only quarter cylinder is analysed and symmetric boundary condition has been implemented.
To find radial stress, rsys,1 command has been used
 

Attachments

  • error1.PNG
    error1.PNG
    7.4 KB · Views: 485
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you run a mesh convergence study, where you increase the mesh density and see if the results change?
 
Mech_Engineer said:
Have you run a mesh convergence study, where you increase the mesh density and see if the results change?
I have and the solution does converge but if the mes h is too dense then it crosses the value and keeps on increasing just like in this case where the pressure applied is 100 but stress is 101
 
Are you using elements with midside nodes? It seems that your mesh results show that the difference is due to mesh density/discontinuity.
 
Mech_Engineer said:
Are you using elements with midside nodes? It seems that your mesh results show that the difference is due to mesh density/discontinuity.
I am using mid size nodes.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top