Analysing 2 Material Cylinder w/ Internal Pressure 100 Units

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawndude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Error
AI Thread Summary
The analysis of a two-material cylinder under an internal pressure of 100 units reveals that the radial stress at the inner radius is 98.23 units, deviating by 2 to 3 percent from the expected value. The properties used include Young's moduli of 1e5 and 2e5, and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3 for both materials. A mesh convergence study indicates that while the solution converges, overly dense meshes can lead to stress values exceeding the applied pressure. The discussion highlights the importance of mesh density and the use of midside nodes in achieving accurate results. Overall, the findings suggest that mesh configuration significantly impacts stress calculations in the cylinder analysis.
Shawndude
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to analyse a two material cylinder glued together .The cylinder is subjected to internal pressure of 100 units. The problem i am facing is that the radial stress at the inner radius (where the internal pressure is applied) is not equal to the internal pressure.I.E. if the internal pressure is 100 units ,the radial stress at the inner radius is 98.23. It generally deviates by 2 to 3 percent.I am attaching a contour plot of the radial stress.
I have used the following properties;
young's modulus E1=1e5...E2=2e5
Poisson's ratio is 0.3 for both materials
Mesh properties: smart size no:1(fine)
free mesh
plane 182 has been used. It is a cylinder with zero height hence area has been defined.Only quarter cylinder is analysed and symmetric boundary condition has been implemented.
To find radial stress, rsys,1 command has been used
 

Attachments

  • error1.PNG
    error1.PNG
    7.4 KB · Views: 483
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you run a mesh convergence study, where you increase the mesh density and see if the results change?
 
Mech_Engineer said:
Have you run a mesh convergence study, where you increase the mesh density and see if the results change?
I have and the solution does converge but if the mes h is too dense then it crosses the value and keeps on increasing just like in this case where the pressure applied is 100 but stress is 101
 
Are you using elements with midside nodes? It seems that your mesh results show that the difference is due to mesh density/discontinuity.
 
Mech_Engineer said:
Are you using elements with midside nodes? It seems that your mesh results show that the difference is due to mesh density/discontinuity.
I am using mid size nodes.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top