1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Analysis - Help me understand this dfn

  1. Jun 17, 2007 #1

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Let A be a set in a metric space and {U_i} be an open cover of A. A number r > 0 such that for all y in A, B(y,r) [itex]\subset[/itex] U_i for some i is called a Lebesgue number for the covering. The infimum of all Legesgue number is called the Lebesgue number for the covering.

    Am I wrong in thinking that if r is a Lebesgue number, then any other number lesser than r is also a Lebesgue number, so that if soon as a Lebesgue number exists, the Lebesgue number for the covering is 0?

    After all, if for some r > 0, B(y,r) [itex]\subset[/itex] U_i for some i, then if r > a > 0, B(y,a) [itex]\subset[/itex] B(y,r) [itex]\subset[/itex] U_i, so that a is also a Lebesgue number.

    :grumpy:
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 17, 2007 #2

    StatusX

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Are you sure its not the supremum?
     
  4. Jun 17, 2007 #3

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    It's infimum in my book. And wiki doesn'T make a distinction btw a and the Lebesgue number.

    Anyone know for sure?
     
  5. Jun 17, 2007 #4

    morphism

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Another vote for supremum.

    Although I haven't seen a definition for the Lebesgue number before.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?