Analytic Geometry: Proving R Lies on Ellipse

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that point R lies on the ellipse defined by the equation ((x^2)/9) + ((y^2)/4) = 1, given concentric circles with equations x^2 + y^2 = 9 and x^2 + y^2 = 4. The points P and Q are established on the inner and outer circles, respectively, with R defined by the coordinates (x1, y0). The relationship between the coordinates of P and Q is highlighted, particularly that they share a common radius, leading to the equation x_0^2 + y_0^2 = 4 and x_1^2 + y_1^2 = 9. The discussion suggests that by eliminating variables, one can derive the ellipse equation, confirming that R lies on the ellipse. The conversation emphasizes the geometric relationships and algebraic manipulations necessary for the proof.
dajugganaut
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I have a analytic geometry question that I need a bit of help with.
consider the concentric circles with the equations:

x^2 + y^2 = 9
and
x^2 +y^2 = 4

A radius from the center O intersects the inner circle at P and the outer circle at Q. The line parallel to the x-axis through P meets the line parallel to the y-axis through Q at the point R. Prove that R lies on the ellipse
((x^2)/9) + ((y^2)/4) =1

Some of the facts I've established:

the distance from P to Q is 1 for sure. Also, the triagle PQR is a right angle triangle. using the ellipse equation, i know that the distance from the center to the vertex is 3, and that the distance from the center to the focus is the square root of 5.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why wouldn't the distance of PQ be 5?
 
if the radius of the inner circle is 2 and the outer one is 3, is the distance between them not 1?
 
Yeah, for some reason I wasn't thinking about those being the squares of the radii. Anyway, I think R would have the ascissa of Q and the ordinate of P. If you solve the respective equations for them, you find (\sqrt{9-y^2}, \sqrt{4-x^2}). I would try solve the equation of ellipse for x and then y and it should be equivelent to the coordinates. I'm not very good at making proofs though, so there might be a problem with that way.
 
Last edited:
Write the point P as (x_0,y_0) and Q as (x_1,y_1). The The fact that P and Q lie on the same radius means that \frac{y_0}{x_0}= \frac{y_1}{x_1}. The horizontal line through P (parallel to the x-axis) is y= y0 and the vertical line through Q (parallel to the y-axis) is x= x1. The point R has coordinates (x1,y0). Of course, x_0^2+ y_0^2= 4 and x_1^2+ y_1^2= 9. Thats a total of 3 equation is 4 unknowns. Use the equations to eliminate x1 and y0. I wouldn't be at all surprized if you were left with \frac{x_0^2}{9}+{y_1^2}{4}= 1!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top