Analytic Solutions to a Few Trig Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dissident Dan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of analytic solutions for the equations A*cos(w*t) + B*t = C and A*cos(Θ) + B*sin(Θ) = C. It is suggested that the first equation does not have an analytic solution in terms of elementary functions, though a solution set can be defined. For the second equation, a method involving rearranging and squaring leads to a straightforward quadratic equation in sin(Θ), which can be solved easily. Participants agree that while the second equation can be solved analytically, the first likely requires numerical approximation. Overall, the consensus is that closed-form solutions are not available for the first equation.
Dissident Dan
Messages
236
Reaction score
2
Is there an analytic solution to an equation of the following form?

A*cos(w*t) + B*t = C

where A, B, C, and w are constants

Maybe it can be solved by expanding the cos() to a series?

I am also wondering the same question about the following, though I believe that I've read/been told that there is no known analytic solution.

A*cos(\Theta) + B*sin(\Theta) = C
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If what you mean by an analytical solution is a finite expression using only "elementary functions" then I don't believe the first has an analytical solution. You could of course always define a solution set:
S = \{t | A\cdot \cos(wt) + Bt = C\}
which I would consider a solution, though it doesn't tell us how to solve it.

For the second it's pretty easy. Rearrange:
A \cdot \cos(\Theta) = C - B\cdot \sin (\Theta)
Square:
A^2 (1-\sin^2(\Theta)) = C^2 + B^2 \sin^2(\Theta) - 2BC\cdot \sin(\Theta)
Then it's a simple quadratic equation in \sin(\Theta).
 
Thanks!

The solution to the second is so simple, I almost can't believe I didn't come up with it. I guess that shows what happens when you haven't had a math class in a few years.

By analytic solution, I mean an equation solved for t, instead of a numerical method.
 
Don't think there is a closed form solution. You'll have to approximate it numerically.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
92
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top