A Analytical expression of Cosmic Variance - Poisson distribution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the Cosmic Variance term, denoted as ##N^{C}##, within the context of the Matter Angular power spectrum. The user has developed a numerical method for the angular power spectrum but lacks an explicit expression for Cosmic Variance. They inquire whether the relation ##\dfrac{\sigma_{p}}{P}=\dfrac{2}{N_{k}^{1/2}}## can be interpreted as a Signal Noise Ratio. A suggestion is made to refer to Wikipedia for Sample Variance and a specific paper that addresses uncertainty due to restricted sample size. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of Cosmic Variance in the user's computations.
fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
I would like to get an analytical expression of Cosmic Variance to be able to compute the Matter Angular Power Spectrum (including theorical signal and spectroscopic Shot Noise). I suspect this Cosmic variane to look like a Poisson distribution but I can't conclude with this up to now.
I have an expression of Matter Angular power spectrum which can be computed numerically by a simple rectangular integration method (see below). I make appear in this expression the spectroscopic bias ##b_{s p}^{2}## and the Cosmic variance ##N^{C}##.

##
\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{gal}, \mathrm{sp}} &=\left[\int_{l_{m i n}}^{l_{\max }} C_{\ell, \mathrm{gal}, \mathrm{sp}}(\ell) \mathrm{d} \ell\right]=b_{s p}^{2}\left[\int_{l_{\min }}^{l_{\max }} C_{\ell, \mathrm{DM}} \mathrm{d} \ell+N^{C}\right]=b_{s p}^{2}\left[\mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{DM}}+N^{C}\right] \\ & \simeq \Delta \ell \sum_{i=1}^{n} C_{\ell, \mathrm{gal}, \mathrm{sp}}\left(\ell_{i}\right)
\end{aligned}
##

I have a code that computes the terms ##C_{\ell, \mathrm{gal}, \mathrm{sp}}\left(\ell_{i}\right)## for each multipole ##\ell_{i}##. But how to compute the term ##N^{C}##, that is to say, the Cosmic Variance ##N^{C}## :

The only documentation I have found is the following slide from Nico Hamaus :

Capture d’écran 2021-06-13 à 11.52.16.png


But as you can see, I have no explicit expression for Cosmic Variance : Could I consider the relation ##\dfrac{\sigma_{p}}{P}=\dfrac{2}{N_{k}^{1/2}}## as a SNR (Signal Noise Ratio) ?

Which expression of Cosmic Variance could I use to compute the whole expression ##\mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{gal}, \mathrm{sp}}## ?

Thanks in advance, Best regards
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top