Analyzing a constraint eqn for a pulley system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around creating a constraint equation for a pulley system, focusing on the reasoning behind the division of certain variables by two. Participants are exploring the mechanics of the system and the implications of the pulley setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the reasoning behind the division of variables in the constraint equation, particularly in relation to the height of the pulleys and the connection of strings. There is an exploration of the mechanical advantage provided by the pulley system.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the mechanics of the system, suggesting that the distance is halved due to the connection of two strings to the second pulley. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these mechanics, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for the discussion. The nature of the pulley system and its mechanical advantages are under examination.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Masses M1 and M2 are connected to a system of strings and pulleys
as shown. The strings are massless and inextensible, and the
pulleys are massless and frictionless. Find the acceleration of M1
Relevant Equations
f=ma
I am having trouble creating the constraint equation for this pulley system.

I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?

Could anyone help me understand why this is?

Screen Shot 2022-02-10 at 1.45.07 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quittingthecult said:
I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?
That term represents the distance of the second pulley from ground level. (The entire expression is equivalent to saying that the height of the first pulley is fixed.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper
Doc Al said:
That term represents the distance of the second pulley from ground level. (The entire expression is equivalent to saying that the height of the first pulley is fixed.)
Oh I see. So since there are two strings connected to the second pulley, that distance is halved?
 
quittingthecult said:
So since there are two strings connected to the second pulley, that distance is halved?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper
quittingthecult said:
...
I am having trouble creating the constraint equation for this pulley system.

I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?

Could anyone help me understand why this is?
You can also analyze the system as a mechanism of instantaneous levers.
The anchored pulley works as a type 1 lever (mechanical advantage = 1).
The movil pulley works as a type 2 lever (mechanical advantage = 2 for M2 respect to M1, or 0.5 for M1 respect to M2).

1644599743788.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
861
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K