Analyzing a constraint eqn for a pulley system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the creation of a constraint equation for a pulley system, specifically addressing the division of the last three variables by 2. The reasoning behind this division is clarified as being due to the presence of two strings connected to the second pulley, which effectively halves the distance from the ground level. Additionally, the mechanics of the system are analyzed, identifying the anchored pulley as a type 1 lever with a mechanical advantage of 1, and the movable pulley as a type 2 lever with a mechanical advantage of 2 for M2 relative to M1, or 0.5 for M1 relative to M2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pulley systems and their mechanics
  • Familiarity with constraint equations in physics
  • Knowledge of mechanical advantage concepts
  • Basic principles of levers and their classifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of constraint equations in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the principles of mechanical advantage in levers
  • Explore the dynamics of pulley systems in engineering applications
  • Investigate the role of tension in multi-string pulley configurations
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of pulley systems and mechanical advantage concepts.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Masses M1 and M2 are connected to a system of strings and pulleys
as shown. The strings are massless and inextensible, and the
pulleys are massless and frictionless. Find the acceleration of M1
Relevant Equations
f=ma
I am having trouble creating the constraint equation for this pulley system.

I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?

Could anyone help me understand why this is?

Screen Shot 2022-02-10 at 1.45.07 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quittingthecult said:
I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?
That term represents the distance of the second pulley from ground level. (The entire expression is equivalent to saying that the height of the first pulley is fixed.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper
Doc Al said:
That term represents the distance of the second pulley from ground level. (The entire expression is equivalent to saying that the height of the first pulley is fixed.)
Oh I see. So since there are two strings connected to the second pulley, that distance is halved?
 
quittingthecult said:
So since there are two strings connected to the second pulley, that distance is halved?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper
quittingthecult said:
...
I am having trouble creating the constraint equation for this pulley system.

I don't understand why the last 3 variables of the following constraint is divided by 2?

Could anyone help me understand why this is?
You can also analyze the system as a mechanism of instantaneous levers.
The anchored pulley works as a type 1 lever (mechanical advantage = 1).
The movil pulley works as a type 2 lever (mechanical advantage = 2 for M2 respect to M1, or 0.5 for M1 respect to M2).

1644599743788.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: guyvsdcsniper

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
833
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K