Analyzing Forces on a Hockey Puck

  • Thread starter Thread starter reignofdragons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing the forces acting on a hockey puck sliding on a smooth icy surface at a constant velocity. Participants are exploring concepts related to forces, including weight, friction, and normal force, as well as misconceptions about velocity and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to identify which forces are acting on the puck, discussing the relevance of weight, friction, and normal force, while questioning the existence of a "force of velocity" and the implications of constant motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the forces involved and some expressing uncertainty about certain concepts. There is a mix of agreement and differing opinions on the presence of friction and the interpretation of forces.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention assumptions about the absence of friction and the nature of forces acting on the puck, highlighting the need for clarity on these points. There is also a note about the potential for air drag to be negligible but not explicitly ruled out.

reignofdragons
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A hockey puck slides along a horizontal, smooth icy surface at a constant velocity as shown.

Draw a free-body diagram for the puck. Which of the following forces are acting on the puck?

1. weight
2. friction
3. force of velocity
4. force of push
5. normal force
6. air drag
7. acceleration


Combinations of answers that were wrong

ABCDEF
ABCE
ACE

I've been at this for awhile and can't picture what's going on. Any help or suggestions are appreciated. Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which do you think are acting on the hockey puck? Never mind the answers that were rejected... what's your feeling as to the right answer?
 
sorry for posting in wrong section

Well...what i thought was

-a puck obviously has weight (1)
-since it's on ice, i think I'm supposed to assume there's no friction (2)
-it has some kind of velocity, so i believe there is a force of velocity (3)
-not sure about force of push...i think we're supposed to assume it's just moving on it's own (4)
-well since there's a weight, which probably means there's a down acceleration due to gravity, there's probably a normal force (5)
-air drag is probably negligible (6)
-not sure what kind of acceleration...since it's moving at a constant rate, i know there's no acceleration in that direction, but what about gravity? (7)
 
reignofdragons said:
sorry for posting in wrong section

Well...what i thought was

-a puck obviously has weight (1)

yup, 1) is definitely right.

-since it's on ice, i think I'm supposed to assume there's no friction (2)

I agree.

-it has some kind of velocity, so i believe there is a force of velocity (3)

But velocity isn't a force... there isn't anything I'm aware of such as a force of velocity...

-not sure about force of push...i think we're supposed to assume it's just moving on it's own (4)

yup... plus I don't think "force of push" is a real force of any kind... a force is a push or a pull... but a "force of push" sounds strange...


-well since there's a weight, which probably means there's a down acceleration due to gravity, there's probably a normal force (5)

Yes, there's definitely a normal force.

-air drag is probably negligible (6)

I'd say air drag is a force acting on the puck... might be negligible... but they haven't explicitly stated anything about it... so I'd say it is there...

-not sure what kind of acceleration...since it's moving at a constant rate, i know there's no acceleration in that direction, but what about gravity? (7)

Yes, there's no acceleration... the normal forces balances gravity... but more importantly acceleration isn't a force...
 
Even if the puck is on ice, I wouldn't automatically assume no friction. Otherwise hockey pucks could be tapped slightly and potentially go across entire arenas. I'd say include at least a small friction force opposing motion.
 
Help

There will be only Weight and Net Force acting on the puck. AE would be your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
15K
Replies
12
Views
7K