Analyzing Nonuniform Circular Motion in an Unbalanced Wheel

AI Thread Summary
The analysis of nonuniform circular motion in an unbalanced wheel reveals that the instantaneous acceleration of the point mass is dependent on its rotational position, specifically described by the cosine of the angle. By simplifying the problem to a pendulum model, the motion can be described using a non-linear differential equation, which can be approximated to a linear form for small angles. The general solution indicates periodic motion, where the weight swings back and forth, reaching equal heights on either side. However, for more complex scenarios, the analysis leads to elliptic integrals that cannot be solved in closed form, necessitating the use of phase plane diagrams to visualize the behavior of the system. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the challenges of solving such dynamic systems, emphasizing their nature as undriven, damped harmonic oscillators.
Jonathan
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
How does one analyse nonuniform circular motion of an unbalanced wheel where the instantaneous acceleration of the anomalous point mass (the one that makes it unbalanced) depends on the position in rotation? In this case, the acceleration depends on the cosine of the angle relative to right-hand side of a horizontal line (0 = 3 o'clock, π/2 = 12 o'clock, etc. as usual).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I wanted to think about this for a while but as soon as I started actually working on it I noticed something: Since the weight is concentrated at a single point, we can ignore the disk and think of the weight as attached to the center of the wheel by a rod: this is the classic "pendulum problem"!

Drawing a force diagram and, of course, using "F= ma", we get
m r d2θ/dt2= -mg sinθ where θ is 0 when the weight is directly below the center of the wheel and r is the distance from the center of the wheel to the weght.

This is a (very) non-linear equation so there is no general method of solution. If θ is small, we can approximate sinθ by θ and get r d2θ/dt2 = - g θ or d2θ/dt2+ g/rθ= 0.


That's a linear homogeneous equation with constant coefficients and its general solution is θ(t)= C1 cos([squ](g/r)θ)+ C2 sin([squ](g/r)θ). In particular, if we hold the wheel so that the weight makes initial angle Θ with the vertical and release it, θ(t)= Θcos([squ](g/r)θ). The weight moves through the vertical and to an equal height on the other side then repeats periodically.

More generally, we can use "quadrature". If we let ω= dθ/dt, we have d2θ/dt2= dω/dt and then, using the chain rule, dθ/dt dω/dθ= ω dω/dθ.

The equation becomes ωdω/dθ= -g/r sinθ so ωdω= (-g/r) sinθdθ and
(1/2)ω2= (g/r)cosθ+ C.

Theoretically, one could solve for ω= dθ/dt and then integrate that but it gives an "elliptic integral" which cannot be done in closed form. What we can do is draw the "phase plane diagram". For a number of different values of C, graph ω against θ. For some values of C you get "circular" graphs (periodic solutions- the wheel swings back and forth). For other values it's not: the wheel just keeps going around in the same direction.


edit: fixed θs and ωs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Finally a post!

Well, just as I thought, no (simple) solution. I hate it when that happens, and it always does because I don't work with simple problems. Thanks!
 
It's an undriven, damped harmonic oscillator, as said- there is an excellent solution. You're trying to solve this differential equation:

m d2x/dt2 + b dx/dt + kx =0

(the right-hand side would be a force function if the oscillator were driven)
solve it for x and you can find the instantaneous position of any particle on the rim of the wheel from time just after initial acceleration.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top