Analyzing Power Absorption in a Lightly Damped Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the power absorbed by a lightly damped harmonic oscillator when driven at frequencies close to its natural frequency, represented by the equation Pavg = (γ2/4) / ((ω0 - ω)2 + γ2/4). The key parameters include the damping constant γ, the natural frequency ω0, and the quality factor Q. The participants emphasize the importance of Taylor expansion around ω ≈ ω0 to simplify the expression and achieve the desired result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic oscillators and damping
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansion
  • Knowledge of the quality factor (Q) in oscillatory systems
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentzian function in the context of damped oscillators
  • Learn about the implications of the quality factor (Q) on system behavior
  • Explore advanced techniques for Taylor expansion in physics
  • Investigate the role of damping in resonance phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on oscillatory systems, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics, will benefit from this discussion.

mbigras
Messages
61
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For a lightly damped harmonic oscillator and driving frequencies close to the natural frequency \omega \approx \omega_{0}, show that the power absorbed is approximately proportional to
<br /> \frac{\gamma^{2}/4}{\left(\omega_{0}-\omega\right)^{2}+\gamma^{2}/4}<br />
where \gamma is the damping constant. This is the so called Lorentzian function.



Homework Equations


<br /> \text{Average power absorbed} = P_{avg} = \frac{F_{0}^{2} \omega_{0}}{2k Q} \frac{1}{\left(\frac{\omega_{0}}{\omega}-\frac{\omega}{\omega_{0}}\right)^{2}+\frac{1}{Q^{2}}} \\<br /> <br /> \omega_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\\<br /> <br /> m = \frac{b}{\gamma}\\<br /> \text{where $b$ is the damping constant and $m$ is the mass}\\<br /> <br /> \Delta \omega = \frac{\gamma}{2}<br />





The Attempt at a Solution


The course of action that I took goes like:
1.Find k and Q in terms of \omega_{0} and \gamma.
2. Chug through and do some algebra (and it is here that its very possible that a mistake was made, but I'll put my result not all the steps).
3. Expand a function about w_{0} and make approximations so that \Delta \omega is small.
(4) See the above equation fall out. This is the stage that I'm stuck at.

<br /> k = b \frac{\omega_{0}^{2}}{\gamma}\\<br /> Q = \frac{\omega_{0}}{\gamma}\\<br /> 2 \Delta \omega = \gamma<br /> \\<br /> P_{avg} = \text{plug in and do lots of algebra...}\\<br /> P_{avg} = \frac{\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}{(\omega_{0}-\omega)^{2}+\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}<br />
Then taylor expanding f(\omega) = \frac{\omega^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}} about \omega_{0}...

Am I on the right try here? I'd like that taylor expansion to equal \frac{1}{4} because then the equation would match the one described in the question but I'm trying it by hand and with mathematica and I'm not seeing them match.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mbigras said:

Homework Statement


For a lightly damped harmonic oscillator and driving frequencies close to the natural frequency \omega \approx \omega_{0}, show that the power absorbed is approximately proportional to
<br /> \frac{\gamma^{2}/4}{\left(\omega_{0}-\omega\right)^{2}+\gamma^{2}/4}<br />
where \gamma is the damping constant. This is the so called Lorentzian function.

Homework Equations


<br /> \text{Average power absorbed} = P_{avg} = \frac{F_{0}^{2} \omega_{0}}{2k Q} \frac{1}{\left(\frac{\omega_{0}}{\omega}-\frac{\omega}{\omega_{0}}\right)^{2}+\frac{1}{Q^{2}}} \\<br /> <br /> \omega_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\\<br /> <br /> m = \frac{b}{\gamma}\\<br /> \text{where $b$ is the damping constant and $m$ is the mass}\\<br /> <br /> \Delta \omega = \frac{\gamma}{2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


The course of action that I took goes like:
1.Find k and Q in terms of \omega_{0} and \gamma.
2. Chug through and do some algebra (and it is here that its very possible that a mistake was made, but I'll put my result not all the steps).
3. Expand a function about w_{0} and make approximations so that \Delta \omega is small.
(4) See the above equation fall out. This is the stage that I'm stuck at.

<br /> k = b \frac{\omega_{0}^{2}}{\gamma}\\<br /> Q = \frac{\omega_{0}}{\gamma}\\<br /> 2 \Delta \omega = \gamma<br /> \\<br /> P_{avg} = \text{plug in and do lots of algebra...}\\<br /> P_{avg} = \frac{\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}{(\omega_{0}-\omega)^{2}+\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}<br />
Then taylor expanding f(\omega) = \frac{\omega^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}} about \omega_{0}...

Am I on the right try here? I'd like that taylor expansion to equal \frac{1}{4} because then the equation would match the one described in the question but I'm trying it by hand and with mathematica and I'm not seeing them match.
That was very good and basically done. The key point is that we Taylor expand around $\omega \approx \omega_0$, in which case
##\frac{\omega^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}} \approx 1/4 ## and the answer is obtained.
 
mbigras said:
P_{avg} = \frac{\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}{(\omega_{0}-\omega)^{2}+\frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}}}
Multiply both the numerator and the denominator by (ω+ω0)2.
P_{avg} = \frac{\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}{(\omega_{0}-\omega)^{2}(\omega+\omega_{0})^{2}+\omega^{2}\gamma^{2}}
When ω is near to ω0 you can replace ω+ω0 by 2ω, and the formula for Pavg can be simplified by ω2.
P_{avg} = \frac{\gamma^{2}}{4(\omega_{0}-\omega)^2+\gamma^{2}}
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
956