Analyzing Seismogram: P & SH Waves in SE Mexico to Ohio

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJLiberator
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing seismograms from a recent earthquake in SE Mexico as recorded in Ohio, specifically regarding the best components to observe P and SH waves. For P waves, the BHE (East-West) component is suggested due to the directional propagation influenced by the fault's rupture direction. In contrast, the BHZ (Up-Down) component is recommended for SH waves, as they are horizontal and their amplitude is affected by the angle of arrival. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the distance and angle between the earthquake source and the recording station to determine the optimal sensor for capturing wave amplitudes. Understanding ray diagrams is also highlighted as a useful tool for visualizing wave propagation and sensor effectiveness.
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


A recent earthquake occurred in SE Mexico and was recorded in Ohio.

1. Which Component (BHZ: Up-Down, BHE: East-West, BHN: Noth-South) of hte seismogram should we look at for the best recording of the P wave?

2. Which Component (BHZ: Up-Down, BHE: East-West, BHN: Noth-South) of hte seismogram should we look at for the best recording of the SH wave?

Homework Equations



I know that P waves propagate in every direction and SH waves are the s waves that are horizontal.

The Attempt at a Solution



From the given seismograms I choose for P waves BHE and for SH waves I choose BHZ.
I understand this problem is dictated by location from earthquake in SE Mexico to Ohio, but I can't understand how to look at it. If that were the case, wouldn't SH wave be best East-to-west (BHE) instead of BHZ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:

Homework Equations



I know that P waves propagate in every direction and SH waves are the s waves that are horizontal.

yes, the P waves do propagate al all directions, BUT their amplitude in a given direction is very dependant on the rupture direction of the fault
relative to where the recorder is. Consider these 2 fault motions in Mexico and the propagation of the P waves
which event is going to produce the largest P waves in Ohio ?

quake.GIF
RJLiberator said:
I understand this problem is dictated by location from earthquake in SE Mexico to Ohio, but I can't understand how to look at it. If that were the case, wouldn't SH wave be best East-to-west (BHE) instead of BHZ?

considering the latitude difference and angle separation between source and recorder, you didn't choose the other axis

but it gets a little more complicated than that and looking at ray diagrams gives a better indication ...

seis_waves.gif


for any recorder at significant distance from the quake, what does that diagram tell you about the
orientation of the waves arriving at the P and S or PP and SS locations ?
and which sensor will record the incoming waves the best at those locations ?cheers
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and RJLiberator
which event is going to produce the largest P waves in Ohio ?

Hm. Wouldn't they be the same still? Horizontal and vertical, if the P-waves propagate in all directions.
 
RJLiberator said:
Hm. Wouldn't they be the same still? Horizontal and vertical, if the P-waves propagate in all directions.

no, look at the angle the P and S waves are arriving at the P, S and PP, SS locations. Which sensor is going to record the waves the best ?
Z, E or N ?

Hint, at a reasonable distance, around 500km or more, the near surface P and S waves are going to be considerably diminished in amplitude. Instead, those following those ray paths are going to be dominant.
I see this time and again in seismograms from my own and other stations recordings.Dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top