Analyzing Shear & Bending on Idealized Cross Section

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing shear forces and bending moments in an idealized cross section of a beam. Participants explore the calculation of shear center and its implications on torque and shear flow distribution, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the process of determining shear forces by integrating shear flows and calculating internal bending moments using normal stresses in two booms.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the shear center location, suggesting that if shear forces are not applied at the shear center, the beam will experience both bending and twisting.
  • A participant questions whether the shear center can be approximated as the centroid when internal loads are assumed to act at the centroid, leading to a discussion about moments from shear distribution.
  • There is a query about the implications of taking moments about points other than the shear center and whether moments must add up to zero in such cases.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential need to "reshuffle" shear forces if a torque is present, indicating a change in the shear flow distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the significance of the shear center in the analysis, but there are multiple competing views regarding the assumptions about the centroid and the implications of torque on shear forces. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the effects of taking moments about different points.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the relationship between shear forces, torque, and the shear center, indicating that assumptions made may affect the outcomes of their calculations. There is also a lack of consensus on how to handle moments when not computed about the shear center.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
POINT A)
Calculate the internal shear force and bending moment(no torque) that would cause the internal stress state given above. Clearly indicated both magnitude and direction, and
show/describe how you arrive at this answer. You may assume the internal loads act at the centroid.

POINT B)
Your colleague seems to recall that also an internal torque was present in the original loading of the structure. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with your colleagues recollection.
You do not need to calculate the internal torque, simply identify if it would be zero or non-zero and
provide sufficient reasoning for your decision.
Relevant Equations
Shear flow distribution resulting from applied shear force and torque,
Internal normal stress resulting from internal bending moment
1675161877631.png
As you can see from the picture, the cross section to analyze is idealized and the boom areas resulting from this are given.
For POINT A) all I did was:
  • for determining the shear forces, integrating the shear flows over the sides to compute the vertical and horizontal contribution of each side to the shear forces: sum of vertical contributions will be ##V_y##, sum of horizontal ##V_x##
  • for determining the internal bending moments, calculting MsOI ##I_{xx}## and ##I_{yy}##(##I_{xy}=0## because of symmetry) and taking the normal stresses in two booms(e.g., 1 and 2) to solve the system of eqs. below for ##M_x## and ##M_y##: $$\left\{\begin{matrix}
    \sigma_1=\frac{M_x}{I_{xx}}y_1+\frac{M_y}{I_{yy}}x_1 \\
    \sigma_2=\frac{M_x}{I_{xx}}y_2+\frac{M_y}{I_{yy}}x_2 \\
    \end{matrix}\right.$$
This gives results for ##V_x, \ V_y, \ M_x, \ M_y##
When it comes to POINT B) though, I get quite confused. What I would do is calculating the shear center SC(in this case, reading the statement of POINT A) I am led to think and assume that this coincides with the centroid C of the section even though this is not true in general; what do you think about this?) of the cross section and then take the moment generated by the shear flow distribution around that point: if the resulting moment is zero, then no torque is present; if it differs from zero, then it means that a torque is acting on the cross section.
Would this make sense? If no, what would? If yes, is there any other(smarter) way to answer the question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
Lnewqban said:
The shear center location is the key in this problem.

Look for 8.4 in the following link:
https://ocw.snu.ac.kr/sites/default/files/NOTE/7511.pdf

“If the sear forces are not applied at the shear center, the beam will undergo both bending and twisting.”
Thank you for sharing this! Then here, quoting the problem statement:
"You may assume the internal loads act at the centroid."
Which means we can approximate the SC to be located @ C, as internal loads do not cause twisting by definition... correct?
So in this case, for figuring out whether we could or could not have torsion, we just take moments from the shear distribution about C and see whether they add up to 0 or nah(?)
 
That is how I see it.
 
Thank you @Lnewqban for your answer!

Another doubt I have regarding to this is: what if I instead took moments about some point other than the SC?
If we don't have torque in the cross section, does this mean that about any point the moments originating from the shear flow distribution must add up to 0? Or does this hold ONLY when we compute such moments about the SC(again, C in this case)?
I know this might sound trivial but it's actually confusing me quite a lot.

Lastly, still with respect to this problem: the ##V_y, \ V_x## we had calculated, assumed no torque. Right?
So if we would now say a torque actually is present, the shear forces would have to be "reshuffled" and recomputed as also the torque would contribute to the final shear flow distribution
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K