Anderson Localization: Decoherence Explanation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Descartz2000
  • Start date Start date
Descartz2000
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
Is decoherence the best way to explain the phenomenon of Anderson Localization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. Anderson localization is a coherent interference effect.
one way to explain it is as follows - think of a quantum particle released inside a disordered medium at point A. The amplitude for that particle to reach to a distant point B in the medium is a sum of all possible paths from A to B. in a disordered medium each path is accompanied with a different (random) phase and therefore you get random interference, and the particle shows diffusion. but this is not Anderson Localization.

Localization kicks in when you take into account the paths that lead from A back to A. there are many such paths of course, but they come in pairs: from A to A in a loop, and from A to A in the same loop but in the opposite direction. Note that such pairs do not exist for paths from A to a different point B. The point is that the two reversed loops from A to A are accompanied with exactly the same phase! - it is the same path, only reversed. as a result, the particle has a constructive interference to remain in point A - the origin. You can show, that as disorder is increased, the number of such loops increases very sharply. this is the correction to diffusion that leads to Anderson localization.
 
That's a nice explanation MGH. Do you happen to know some introductory material into the subject? (graduate level)
 
Anderson Localization and Its Ramifications: Disorder, Phase Coherence and Electron Correlation

Springer 2003

If you are familiar with the second quantization treatment, maybe not quite an intro. book - but solid.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top