Angle between vectors that are both off set by a third vector

IMK
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello, was wondering if someone could help me with a little vector maths problem please.

What I need to find is the angle between two vectors that are derived from/relative to a third vector.

So what I having working/understood is that theta = cos-1(“vector a” * “vector b”) where “vector a” and “vector b” are 3d vectors at 90 deg to each other, x,y,z.
Basically the cos of the dot product of the two vectors…

What I now wish to do is to offset “vector a” and “vector b” by another vector, “vector c” and I have tried the following with mixed results.

(1) “vector a” = “vector a” - “vector c”, “vector b” = “vector b” - “vector c”
this returns an answer that is obviously incorrect.

(2) “vector a”= sqrt( “vector a” * “vector c”), “vector b” = sqrt(“vector b” *“vector c”), this returns an answer that seems to be correct as I can swap around the x,y,z values any of the vectors and the result seem to be consistent.

However I have no way of really proving the result, so can you help please?

Many thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
huh? the dot product is \vec{a}\bullet\vec{b}=|\vec{a}||\vec{b}|cos(\theta)
the vectors do not have to be 90 degree apart but when they are cos(90)=1 so the formula just doesn't include the cos.

theres no reason why method one shouldn't work. the dot product distributes so a dot (b+c) =adotb +adot c

the angle between two with another one added to each one of them is just the angle between the resultant vectors. write everything out explicitly and you'll have angle of theta in terms of vector c
 
Many thanks

ice109 said:
huh? the dot product is \vec{a}\bullet\vec{b}=|\vec{a}||\vec{b}|cos(\theta)
the vectors do not have to be 90 degree apart but when they are cos(90)=1 so the formula just doesn't include the cos.

theres no reason why method one shouldn't work. the dot product distributes so a dot (b+c) =adotb +adot c

the angle between two with another one added to each one of them is just the angle between the resultant vectors. write everything out explicitly and you'll have angle of theta in terms of vector c

Ice109,
Many thanks for your input, I have had time to think more about my problem and it is really only vector b that I need to adjust/rotate by vector c. So I will have a think about your input and see if I can figure a way to do it.
Again many thanks IMK
 
what is your problem. state is succinctly and maybe we can help
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top