Angular acceleration of a merry-go-round - no time given?

AI Thread Summary
A merry-go-round accelerates uniformly from rest to a speed of 2.5 rpm over 5 revolutions, leading to a question about calculating angular acceleration without a given time. The conversion of 2.5 rpm to radians per second is noted as 0.262 rad/s. The angular acceleration formula requires both change in angular speed and time, but the time was initially misunderstood. The discussion reveals that using the equation of motion for rotation, specifically ω_f² = ω_i² + 2αθ, helps clarify the relationship between angular displacement and acceleration. Ultimately, the correct calculation of angular acceleration is confirmed to be 0.0011 rad/s².
murielglass
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Angular acceleration of a merry-go-round - no time given!?

Homework Statement



A merry-go-round accelerating uniformly from rest achieves its operating spped of 2.5rpm in 5rev. What is the magnitude of its angular acceleration?

2.5rpm=0.262rad/s

Homework Equations



angular acceleration = change in angular speed / time

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried every possible thing I could think of. I actually know what the answer is (0.0011rad/s^2) but I can't find how they get to that. The teacher told me that if the final angular speed is 2.5rpm and it takes it 5rev to get that final angular speed, then t=2min.. but it doesn't make sense to me since the merrygoround is not moving at that final speed since t=0. plus, i don't get the right answer using t=120s. so I've tried calculating angular speeds for each revolution, assuming that in rev#1 the merry-go-round goes from 0 to 0.5rpm (=0.0524rad/s), from 0.5 to 1rpm, etc, averaging speeds and without averaging, but i keep getting it wrong. I'm guessing there's a conceptual issue I'm missing in this line of thought.

i figured out by the angular acceleration formula that t should equal 238.1s, but I want to know how they get to that number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta
 


rock.freak667 said:
Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta

Yes! It's in my book too. could i use that one? theta is.. final position - initial position?

What would be my position here? final=10pi rad - initial=0?

that actually makes sense..
 


rock.freak667 said:
Do you know the equations of motion for rotation?

Mainly

\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2 \alpha \theta

i get 0.109 :D

thanks so much. God bless you, my friend.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top