Angular acceleration of a pendulum on an accelerating train

AI Thread Summary
The angular acceleration of a pendulum on an accelerating train is influenced by the train's acceleration, which can be combined with gravitational acceleration to determine the total effective acceleration. This results in the pendulum oscillating around the direction of the total acceleration vector, with its period depending on the magnitude of this vector. If the train's acceleration is constant, the behavior of the pendulum is straightforward, but variable acceleration complicates the motion, requiring differential equations for analysis. In cases of slow changes in acceleration relative to the pendulum's period, the motion approximates oscillation around a slowly changing vertical. The assumption is that the pendulum can freely oscillate in the plane defined by the gravitational and train acceleration vectors.
Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
If I hang a pendulum on the ceiling of an accelerating train (with an initial angular displacement), how would the angular acceleration be affected?

My intuition told me that the angular acceleration of the pendulum should be affected by the acceleration of the train. But...whether the train accelerate or not, the force acting on the tangential direction of the pendulum is still the mass of the pendulum right? So it seems tat the angular acceleration of the pendulum will be affected by length and gravitational acceleration alone, and not the acceleration of the train?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Acceleration due to gravity is no different from acceleration for any other reason. Thus you can simply add the two acceleration vectors to get a total acceleration that replaces ##g## in the equations of motion.

If the acceleration of the train is constant then the result follows trivially. The pendulum oscillates about the direction of the total acceleration vector with a period dependent on the magnitude of the sum.

If the acceleration isn't constant you can write down the differential equations governing the motion as in my first paragraph, but they won't be analytically soluble in general. Although if you require that the change in acceleration be slow compared to the period of the pendulum then I expect it wouldn't be far off the obvious "oscillates around slowly changing 'vertical' with slowly changing period".

Note that I've assumed throughout that the pendulum is free to oscillate in the plane defined by the gravitational and train acceleration vectors. If it isn't, life gets more complicated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top