Angular Acceleration Problem - The Grindstone Problem

AI Thread Summary
To solve the grindstone problem involving angular acceleration, it's essential to recognize the parallels between translational and rotational motion equations. The grindstone starts from rest and completes 20.0 revolutions in 8.00 seconds, indicating a need to apply the appropriate angular kinematic equations. The confusion often arises from the variety of formulas available, but focusing on the relationship between angular displacement and angular acceleration simplifies the process. Understanding that both types of motion share similar principles can aid in determining the angular acceleration. Ultimately, applying the correct rotational formulas will yield the solution to the problem.
gcombina
Messages
157
Reaction score
3
A grindstone, initially at rest, is given a constant angular acceleration so that it makes 20.0 rev in the first 8.00 s. What is its angular acceleration?

I don't know which angular formula to use and how many are out there? I am so confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off you might want to post in the homework help sub forum.

Second off, my tip is to realize the parallels between translational and rotational equations. They both simply deal with a position variable and it's rate of change, whether it be x or theta, the relations between the simple number and it's rate if change are the exact same.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top