Angular momentum conservation of two point masses

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of angular momentum in a system of two point masses, one fixed and the other rotating in a circular path. Participants explore the implications of changing the radius of the circular path and the forces involved, questioning how angular momentum is conserved under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant posits that when a rotating mass is pulled closer to a fixed mass, the conservation of angular momentum implies that the tangential speed of the rotating mass should increase, despite the force applied being orthogonal to the velocity vector.
  • Another participant explains that if the object is pulled in using a central force, the force is perpendicular to the original circular path but not to the spiral path, leading to an increase in speed due to a forward component of the force.
  • A further contribution clarifies that the spiral motion results from the tangential velocity vector acquiring a perpendicular component due to the pulling force, while the tangential component remains constant.
  • One participant challenges the previous points by stating that during spiral motion, the instantaneous center of rotation is not at the center of the spiral, suggesting that the force acting towards the center has a forward component that affects the motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of the forces involved and the nature of the motion, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the explanation of the phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities of angular momentum conservation, particularly regarding the definitions of forces and motion paths, and the implications of applying forces in different orientations.

adoion
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Lets suppose we have 2 point masses one fixed and imoveable the other rotateing in a perfect circle around the first imoveable one with constant speed.

Regardless of vich force is keeping the rotating mass on its circular orbit.
It may be a string or gravitational force or whatever.

The velocity of the rotating mass will allways be tangential to the circle the mass follows but the velocity vector intensity is the same as stated above (constant speed).

Now let's pull the rotating mass closer to the fixed mass, shorten the radius.
The conservation of angular momentum states that the the tangential spped of the rotating object should increase

If we aply a force orthogonal to the velocity vector to shorten the radius then this force could never ever change the intensity of the velocity.
Yet the conservation of angular momentum states different.

What is going on
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are pulling the object in using a central force then that force is perpendicular to the object's original circular path. But it is not perpendicular to the object's spiral path as it is reeled in. The object speeds up because the force has a forward-pointing component along its path.

If, instead, you were pulling the object in using a force that was perpendicular to the object's spiral path then that force could not be centrally directed. In this case, angular momentum would not be conserved because the force would be an unbalanced external torque on the system. The circling object would retain its original speed, but would lose angular momentum.
 
The spiral motion happends because the tangential velocity vector gets a component perpendicular to it because of the pulling force and the new vector is composed of the tangential component vitch remains constant and the ortogonal component vitch increases as long as rhe force is acting.

So there is no non-orthogonal component of the force on the tangential part of the velocity vector.

When force comes to hold the orthogonal component of the velocity dies out and one is left with the same velocity vector as at the begining.
Tangential to the now again circular path and same in magnitude as before.

So what is going on
 
the tangential velocity vector gets a component perpendicular to it because of the pulling force

No. When it's moving in a spiral the instantaneous centre about which the object is rotating is NOT the center of the spiral. The instantaneous centre of rotation moves. See diagram. In this case the point is rotating around a point to the right of the centre of the spiral. This means that a force acting towards the centre of the spiral has a forward component.
 

Attachments

  • spiral.jpg
    spiral.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 504

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K