Angular Oscillation of a rod in a circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the angular frequency of small oscillations for a uniform rod moving in a vertical circle. The rod's equilibrium position is established, and the mechanical energy in a displaced position is analyzed using the moment of inertia calculations. The energy conservation principle leads to a second-order differential equation for angular displacement, which simplifies under the small angle approximation. The approach taken aligns with the principles of pendulum motion, suggesting the method is valid. The calculations and reasoning presented indicate a solid understanding of the dynamics involved.
Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



A uniform rod moves in a vertical circle .Its ends are constrained to move on the track without friction.Find the angular frequency of small oscillation .

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose the rod of length L moves in a circle of radius R .
Let the equilibrium position of the rod be AB .X be the mid point .CD is the position of the rod when it displaced by an angle θ .Y is the mid point.

The mechanical energy of the rod in position CD is denoted by E .

The moment of inertia of the rod about its CM (the middle point) is Icm
The moment of inertia of the rod about O is I .

I_{cm} = ML^2/12

I=I_{cm} + Md^2

I=M(R^2-\frac{L^2}{6})

E= mgd(1-cos\theta)+(1/2)I\dot\theta^2

Differentiating E w.r.t time ,we get

dE/dt = mgdsin\theta\dot\theta+(1/2)I(2\dot\theta\ddot\theta)

Since Mechanical energy remains conserved ,

Putting dE/dt=0 ,we get

\ddot\theta = -\frac{mgdsin\theta}{I}

Using small angle approximation , sinθ≈θ

\ddot\theta = -\frac{mgd\theta}{I}

Is my approach correct ?
 

Attachments

  • Rod oscillation.jpg
    Rod oscillation.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 602
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me. (It's clearly the same as making a pendulum out of the rod by attaching a light bar length d rigidly, at right angles, to its centre.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top