Angular velocity and c: Is this a paradox? Can you explain it?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of angular velocity in relation to the speed of light, particularly in the context of a hypothetical large spinning disc. Participants explore the constraints on the size and angular velocity of the disc, questioning whether it is theoretically possible to construct such a disc without exceeding the speed of light at its edge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if a disc spins with an angular velocity of 57 rad/s, a radius greater than 5,260,000 m would result in tangential velocity exceeding the speed of light.
  • Another participant asserts that there is a constraint on the size of the disc, suggesting a relationship between radius and angular velocity.
  • Some participants argue that the constraint mentioned is more about angular velocity than size, questioning the theoretical limits of constructing a large disc.
  • A participant explains that solid bodies are held together by intermolecular forces, which would become infinite as the disc spins faster, leading to structural failure.
  • It is noted that even a hypothetical material with perfect rigidity would still shatter at certain speeds, indicating a practical limit to the disc's size and speed.
  • Another participant adds that accelerating the disc to the speed of light would require infinite energy, further complicating the feasibility of such a scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are constraints related to the size and angular velocity of the disc, but there is contention regarding the nature of these constraints and the theoretical possibility of constructing such a disc.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of physical forces and energy requirements without resolving the exact limits or conditions under which a spinning disc could operate without exceeding the speed of light.

diligence
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
I thought of this today while studying relativity.

Imagine a very large disc spinning with an arbitrary angular velocity. Perhaps w=57 rad/s (this is the speed of a CD, got this from a random physics text, whatever, the speed is really not important)..

The speed of light is c=3*10^8 m/s.

Since tangential velocity v=rw, if one were to sit anywhere on the disc such that r > 5,260,000m, then you will be traveling faster than the speed of light.

But this is impossible.

How can you explain this? Is there a constraint on how large the disc can be?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
diligence said:
Is there a constraint on how large the disc can be?
Yes.
 
DaleSpam said:
Yes.

ok, then what is it? ~5million meters is not very far in the grand scheme of things.
 
DaleSpam said:
r<c/w

that's not exactly a size constraint, more like an angular velocity constraint. i don't see any reason why it's theoretically impossible to build a disc of arbitrarily large size.

so you claim that no matter what size the disc is, it's angular velocity will be constrained such that v at the very edge will be < c ?
 
diligence said:
so you claim that no matter what size the disc is, it's angular velocity will be constrained such that v at the very edge will be < c ?
Yes.
 
The reason is that solid bodies aren't held together by magic; they're held together by internal intermolecular forces. The internal forces required to maintain that rigidity become infinite as you spin the disk that fast. So it shatters.

Of course, any real disk will shatter long before its edge reaches c, but even a disk of pure unobtanium will shatter at that speed/radius.
 
ZikZak said:
The reason is that solid bodies aren't held together by magic; they're held together by internal intermolecular forces. The internal forces required to maintain that rigidity become infinite as you spin the disk that fast. So it shatters.

Of course, any real disk will shatter long before its edge reaches c, but even a disk of pure unobtanium will shatter at that speed/radius.

Also, remember that as the velocity increases it takes more and more energy to continue to accelerate the disc. You could not physically get it to c because that would take infinite energy.
 
ZikZak said:
The reason is that solid bodies aren't held together by magic; they're held together by internal intermolecular forces. The internal forces required to maintain that rigidity become infinite as you spin the disk that fast. So it shatters.

Of course, any real disk will shatter long before its edge reaches c, but even a disk of pure unobtanium will shatter at that speed/radius.

well i guess there certainly is a size constraint, in that the part of the disc that is too large will just fly apart.

sorry for doubting you dale, and thanks for explaining it everybody else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K