Angular Velocity in the Rotating systems

Click For Summary
In a rotating system with a constant angular velocity ω, the representation of a vector r in a fixed coordinate system is time-dependent. The discussion focuses on verifying the relationship between the time derivative of r and the angular velocity using the equation ##\dot{r} = \omega \times r##. It is emphasized that ω should align with the axis of rotation, specifically (0,0,1)^T. The calculations confirm that the expression for ##\dot{R} R^T## requires a factor of ##\dot{\alpha}##, leading to a specific form of the cross product. Ultimately, the calculations validate the initial assertion regarding the relationship between angular velocity and the time derivative of r.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Summary: Consider a body which is rotating with constant angular velocity ω about some
axis passing through the origin. Assume the origin is fixed, and that we are sitting
in a fixed coordinate system ##O_{xyz}##
If ##\rho## is a vector of constant magnitude and constant direction in the rotating system,
then its representation r in the fixed system must be a function of t.

1655031471029.png

1655031551071.png


Now how to verify ##\dot{r}= \omega \times r ##
My attempt:

1655031782591.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\omega should be parallel to the axis of rotation, which here is (0,0,1)^T. So you need to double check your calculation of \dot R R^T. Remember that \dot R = \dot\alpha \dfrac{dR}{d\alpha}.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes WMDhamnekar and Delta2
pasmith said:
\omega should be parallel to the axis of rotation, which here is (0,0,1)^T. So you need to double check your calculation of \dot R R^T. Remember that \dot R = \dot\alpha \dfrac{dR}{d\alpha}.
I got as author said ## \dot{r}(v) =\omega \times r ## So, I tagged this question ' SOLVED'
 
Last edited:
Tour \dot R R^T is correct, but needs to be multiplied by a factor of \dor \alpha, which is unknown. Then you have <br /> \dot R R^T \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} = \dot \alpha \begin{pmatrix}-y \\ x \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. Can you find (\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3) such that <br /> \begin{pmatrix} \omega_1 \\ \omega_2 \\ \omega_3 \end{pmatrix} \times \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix}<br /> = \dot \alpha\begin{pmatrix} -y \\ x \\ 0\end{pmatrix}?
 
pasmith said:
Tour \dot R R^T is correct, but needs to be multiplied by a factor of \dor \alpha, which is unknown. Then you have <br /> \dot R R^T \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} = \dot \alpha \begin{pmatrix}-y \\ x \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. Can you find (\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3) such that <br /> \begin{pmatrix} \omega_1 \\ \omega_2 \\ \omega_3 \end{pmatrix} \times \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix}<br /> = \dot \alpha\begin{pmatrix} -y \\ x \\ 0\end{pmatrix}?
Hi,
## [ 0,0,1] \times [ -y \sin{\alpha} + x \cos{\alpha}, y\cos{\alpha} + x \sin{\alpha}, z ] = [ -y \cos{\alpha}-x\sin{\alpha}, -y\sin{\alpha}+ x\cos{\alpha}, 0 ] = \omega \times r = \dot{r} ##

So, we get what author said/got.
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
650
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K