Annihilation/creation operator question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KevinMcHugh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
KevinMcHugh
Messages
32
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
These operators increase/decrease occupation number by one particle. What observable do these operators represent?
I'm just curious what physical processes these operators represent. Since particles are created/destroyed in pairs, do they have to applied twice to describe an actual process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KevinMcHugh said:
Summary: These operators increase/decrease occupation number by one particle. What observable do these operators represent?

I'm just curious what physical processes these operators represent. Since particles are created/destroyed in pairs, do they have to applied twice to describe an actual process?
They don't represent physical processes or observables (they're not self adjoint or unitary). They're just formal operators useful in quantum field theory.

Wigner managed to find a way to classify all particle states in Minkowski spacetime. With each type there is an associated creation/annihilation operator and free quantum fields ultimately turn out to be just (generalized) Fourier transforms of them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, KevinMcHugh and PeroK
Thank you DarMM. I was under the assumption operators represent observables in QM.
 
KevinMcHugh said:
Thank you DarMM. I was under the assumption operators represent observables in QM.
Only self-adjoint operators do. And even then there are questions over whether all do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and KevinMcHugh