Another algebra and trig question (maybe not though)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Trig
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of a function from polar coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, specifically examining the function u(r,θ) = r cos θ + r⁻¹ cos θ and its Cartesian equivalent u(x,y) = |x| + |x|/ (x² + y²). Participants are exploring the implications of using absolute values in the context of derivatives and function equivalence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of differentiating the absolute value function and question the appropriateness of dropping the absolute value in the Cartesian form. They consider specific points in both coordinate systems to verify function equivalence and explore the implications of their findings.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the transformation equations and have pointed out discrepancies in function values when using absolute values. There is an ongoing exploration of how to handle the absolute value in the context of derivatives and function equivalence, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the depth of exploration into the mathematical concepts involved. The discussion includes questioning the definitions and assumptions related to the functions being analyzed.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I have [itex]u(r,\theta)=r \cos \theta + r^{-1}\cos \theta[/itex] and then am changing coordinates [itex]u(x,y)=|x|+\frac{|x|}{x^2+y^2}[/itex]. I then have to compute the vector [itex]\vec v = (u_x,u_y)[/itex].

The thing is, is the derivative of [itex]|x|[/itex] is [itex]sign\,\,x[/itex]. I don't think we should be dealing with this function. So I'm not sure how I should be dropping the absolute value to get to: [itex]u(x,y)=x+\frac{x}{x^2+y^2}[/itex].

I'm thinking it is from the conversion to polar to cartesian... but I'm not sure. Maybe it is within the definition of [itex]\tan^{-1}[/itex]... but again I'm not sure. Well I'm sick of throwing random darts, so if anyone has any suggestions, I'm all ears :)
Please note that [itex]u(x,y)[/itex] was my conversion from polar coordiantes to cartesian, so this could also be a problem, and might be incorrect.

Thankyou.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the polar point (1, [itex]\pi[/itex]) this should be the same as (-1,0) in Cartesian coordinates.

These points should yield the same result for your function. Do they?

Consider your rectangular function both with and without the abs, which gives the correct result?
 
Consider that [itex]u(r,\theta)=r \cos \theta + r^{-1}\cos \theta = r \cos \theta + \frac{r\cos \theta}{r^2}[/itex] and you can get it from there, correct?
 
Integral:
Interesting. That makes sense.
[tex]u_{polar}(1,\pi) = \cos \pi + \cos \pi =-2[/tex]

[tex]u_{cart}(-1,0) = |-1| + \frac{|-1|}{1}=2 \neq -2[/tex]

So I should drop the abs functions for [itex]u(x,y) [/tex]. I'm curious. How did you know to think of this as a counter example? <br /> <br /> Benorin:<br /> I wish I understood what you are conveying in the algebraic rewrite of the expression. I'm sorry but I don't understand.[/itex]
 
Use the transformation equations

benorin said:
Consider that [itex]u(r,\theta)=r \cos \theta + r^{-1}\cos \theta = r \cos \theta + \frac{r\cos \theta}{r^2}[/itex] and you can get it from there, correct?

Recall that

[tex]x=r\cos \theta, \, y=r\sin \theta,\mbox{ and }x^2+y^2=r^2[/tex]​

(even though we won't use the second equation) so that

[tex]u(r,\theta)=r \cos \theta + r^{-1}\cos \theta = r \cos \theta + \frac{r\cos \theta}{r^2} = x + \frac{x}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]​
 
Oh snap!
I didn't see what you were showing before. That's cool. Thanks man :)

hehe, I don't know how I didn't see that!
 
Sure, glad to help: so post another.
 
lol, will do. I have another homework problem that is bugging me, but I need to get some sleep. It's been a fun st patricks day, and I'm not really in the proper mind to be working on it right now :)
 
Frog pad,
It is a very good practice on this type of problem to pick a easy to verify point. We needed some thing that would yield a negitive result, thus cos [itex]\pi[/itex].

Looks like every thing is happy now! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K