Another conservation of momentum question, but this one involves gravity

AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in the baseball-Moon system due to the equal and opposite forces they exert on each other. When the baseball is thrown upwards, it gains momentum in the upward direction, while the Moon experiences an equal and opposite change in momentum. Although the baseball's individual momentum changes as it ascends and descends, the overall momentum of the system remains constant. The Moon gains momentum in the direction opposite to the baseball's initial throw. Understanding these interactions clarifies how momentum conservation applies in gravitational contexts.
kashiark
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
If you throw a baseball up on the moon, and it comes down, how is momentum conserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum of the "baseball-Moon" system will be conserved, but the momentum of the baseball alone would not.
 
How? I don't understand.
 
kashiark said:
How? I don't understand.
How what? What specifically don't you understand?

What are the conditions under which momentum is conserved?
 
Does the moon gain momentum in the direction the ball was going?
 
The moon and baseball exert equal and opposite forces on each other. If one gains momentum in one direction, the other must lose momentum in that same direction (or gain it in the opposite direction).
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Conservation of momentum and conservation of energy details
Replies
30
Views
2K
I When are the initial and final momentums the same (conserved)?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
972
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
B Why is KE not conserved when momentum is?
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Conservation of Momentum for system of particles
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
B Conservation of momentum in a closed system
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Conservation of angular momentum -- spinning a bicycle wheel in space
Replies
2
Views
2K
Conservation of linear and angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top