Another easy Conservation of Energy Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving conservation of energy in a swinging motion. The girl on the swing reaches her maximum speed at the lowest point due to the conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy. Calculations indicate her maximum speed at the lowest point is 3.13 m/sec, while at the highest point, it is 6.26 m/sec, but the correct maximum speed is 5.42 m/sec. The key takeaway is that as she descends, her potential energy decreases and is converted into kinetic energy, with some energy remaining due to her height above the ground. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
XxMuDvAyNexX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
A girl swings back and forth on a swing with ropes that are 4.00 m long. The maximum height she reaches is 2 m above the ground. At the lowest point of the swing she is .5 m above the ground. (a) The girl attains the maximum speed (1)at the top, (2) in the middle, (3) at the bottom of the swing. Why? (b) What is the girl's maximum speed?



I think 1/2mv^2=mghmax then the M would cancel leaving 1/2v^2=ghmax. Then I ended up with v=square root of 2ghmax.

Well using that equation I keep getting 3.13 m/sec for the lowest point(.5 m) and 6.26 m/sec for the highest point(2 m). The answers are the bottom since the lower the potential energy the higher the kinetic energy. And the other answer is 5.42 m/sec. I'm pretty lost on this one...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, hopefully you should be able to see the answer to part (a) right off the bat. At the top of the swing she has the most gravitational potential energy, and the lower she goes in the swing, the more of it is converted to kinetic energy.

Not all of it is converted though, because she's always at least 0.5m from the ground.

So her kinetic energy at the bottom of the swing is equal to the change in GPE.

Have another go now and see if you can get it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top