What is the velocity of the incident ball after the perfectly elastic collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niki4d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of an incident steel ball after a perfectly elastic collision with an identical stationary ball. The initial conditions include a 5.00 x 10^-3 kg ball moving at 1.20 m/s, which is deflected 30 degrees post-collision. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of momentum and energy, noting that the angles of the balls' velocities must be considered, particularly that they should be 90 degrees apart after the collision. There is confusion regarding the vector diagram and the calculation of velocities, with one participant mistakenly attributing the calculated velocity to the wrong ball. The correct approach involves recognizing the angles and applying the momentum conservation principles accurately.
niki4d
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5.00 X 10^-3 kg steel ball moving 1.20m/s collides elastically (no loss of kinetic energy) with an identical, stationary steel ball. The incident ball is deflected 30 degrees from its original path.
(a) Draw a vector diagram showing the paths of both balls after the perfectly elastic collision.
(b) What is the velocity of the incident ball after the collision?


Homework Equations



All I used is the initial momentum = final momentum theorem and p=mv.

The Attempt at a Solution



a
I drew the vector diagram: ----->
\30d |
\ |
p=mv \ |
=.006kgm/s \ |
\ |
\ |
a=.005196kgm/s
p=mv
v= 1.04m/s

Is this the correct way to do it? I think i mixed some things up as the velocity I found was for the horizonal vector, which should be the struck ball.. It feels like I made a real obvious mistake.. but its just out of reach.. :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, no.. the vector diagram didn't turn out in the post..
a
---->
\ |
\ |
\ |
\ |
\ |

the hypotnuse is where i put the p=mv equation and solved. I ended up with the velocity of the horizontal vector, which is not correct.
I hope this diagram shows up!
 
Apparently not.. next time I'll try a picture..
 
that "diagram" is impossible for me to read... sorry.

anyways, you did well to recongize that you should use conservation of momentum, and energy. conservation of momentum is applied for each independant direction (each vector component), so you need to use the angles that the two balls make with the incident direction in your calculations. do you know what the angle that the second ball's velocity makes with the original direction?
 
Here is the diagram I drew. The 30 degree angle is on the left side. On the hypotnuse side I got .006kgm/s. and solving it for the stationary ball, i got the velocity as 1.04 m/s. (Used p=mv) Shouldnt 1.04m/s be for the incident ball though?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 407
nope. not the right diagram. angle between ball's velocities is wrong.
 
Would that be the right diagram or am I doing this completely wrong.. :bugeye:
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 367
The last diagram would be the same thing wouldn't it.. is this the right way?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled1.jpg
    Untitled1.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 376
it's wrong because the ball which was initially stationary does *not* move straight forward along the horizontal axis. It's velocity also makes an angle with the horizontal axis. It is well-known (and should be in your book somewhere) that after the collision the angle between the velocities must be 90 degrees. You are given the angle which one ball's velocity makes with the horizontal, thus what must the other angle be?
 
Back
Top