Another Notation Thing: Del^2 V

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The subscript notation (\theta, \phi) on the Laplace operator \nabla^2 V_{(\theta, \phi)} indicates the specific coordinates used in the context of spherical coordinates, particularly when integrating the potential over a surface. It suggests that these variables are held constant during differentiation, contrasting with the notation \nabla^2_{r'} V(r-r'), which specifies the variable being integrated over. The discussion emphasizes that the subscript should ideally be placed on the operator rather than the potential function itself. The notation \nabla^2_{xy} is also referenced, illustrating how subscripts can denote differentiation with respect to specific variables. Overall, the use of subscripts clarifies which variables are relevant in the operation being performed.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
What does the subscript (\theta, \phi) mean on the laplace operator? i.e.

{\nabla}^2 V_{(\theta, \phi)}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide the context of this notation?
 
hmm, the lapace operator is normally just the nabla^2, perhaps the subscipt specifies the variables/co-ordinates of the function V on which the laplace operator is operating
 
I think the variables should be on the operator, and not on the potential. I've seen it most commonly like this:

\nabla^2_{r'} V(r-r')

where the subscript is to remind us that, as CPL.Luke says, that we are differentiating with respect to the dashed variables (or undashed, as it is in your example)
 
masudr said:
I think the variables should be on the operator, and not on the potential. I've seen it most commonly like this:

\nabla^2_{r'} V(r-r')

where the subscript is to remind us that, as CPL.Luke says, that we are differentiating with respect to the dashed variables (or undashed, as it is in your example)
Ooops..:blushing: I meant to put the subscript on the operator not on the function. Sorry about that.
 
In response to the context of my question, the author who used this notation was integrating the potential on the surface of the sphere. So I guess the notation {{\nabla}^2}_{(\theta, \phi)} V is used to denote the variables which are held constant while the notation {{\nabla}^2}_r V is used to denote the variable(s) which are being integrated over.
 
I've seen \nabla^2_{xy} to mean

\nabla^2_{xy}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}
 
quasar987 said:
I've seen \nabla^2_{xy} to mean

\nabla^2_{xy}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}

This is what i would say. i believe the theta and phi in the subscript in the original post imply spherical coordinates.
 
without the radial derivatives.
 
Back
Top