Another try at a difficult proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter sebasalekhine7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mathematical proof involving Riemann sums and expansion series, specifically the expression \(\frac{x^n}{\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}}=\frac{(x-1)x^n}{x^n-1}\). Participants suggest transforming the sum by changing the variable of summation to simplify the expression. One user proposes using the geometric series sum formula to derive the denominator, leading to the conclusion that \(\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^{i}\). The conversation highlights different methods to arrive at the same result, emphasizing the creativity in mathematical problem-solving.
sebasalekhine7
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I found something very strange working with Riemann sums and expansion series.
Can anyone tell me why
\frac{x^n}{\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}}=\frac{(x-1)x^n}{x^n-1}

Excuse the profanity, but I thought in the beginning this was a disgusting joke! :smile: :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define a new variable of summation
j=:n-i

Transform the sum \sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i} into a sum over "j" and the result will come out immediately.

Daniel.

P.S.What profanity?:confused:
 
Sorry, but I don't quite understand how to do what you just wrote.
 
sebasalekhine7 said:
Sorry, but I don't quite understand how to do what you just wrote.

The way I did, just multiply the numerator and denominator by x-1. So in the denominator you get 2 summations (one minus the other). Simplify the denominator.
 
It doesn't make any sense to me.
j=:n-i (1)
i=1 \Rightarrow j=n-1 (2)
i=n \Rightarrow j=0 (3)

The new sum (over "j") becomes
\sum_{j=n-1}^{j=0} x^{j}=\sum_{j=0}^{j=n-1} x^{j}=\frac{x^{n}-1}{x-1} (4)

Now plug it in the initial expression and u'll find the desired result...

Daniel.
 
If you multiply the denominator through by x-1 you get:

\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i+1} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i}

You can simplify the above (try to make the two sums look the same) and get x^n-1
 
How do you make that simplification...?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
How do you make that simplification...?

Daniel.

Similar to your method:

\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-i+1} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i} =

\sum_{i=1}^{n} x^{n-(i-1)} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i}=

For the first sum, let j=i-1

\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^{n-j} - \sum_{i=1}^{n}x^{n-i} =

(x^{n-0} + \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} x^{n-j}) - (\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}x^{n-i} + x^{n-n}) =

I take out the first term from the first sum and last term from the second sum.

The two sums that are left cancel each other out.

x^n-1
 
Wow,that's so simple!*admirative*...Gosh,why didn't i think of that...?*envy*

Daniel.

P.S.We should let the OP decide which solution he likes best.
 
  • #10
I think they are both equally creative, well, thanks a lot for your help.
 
  • #11
dextercioby said:
Wow,that's so simple!*admirative*...Gosh,why didn't i think of that...?*envy*

Daniel.

P.S.We should let the OP decide which solution he likes best.

:smile: well, yours is the faster solution.
 
  • #12
Why can't one just use the sum for Geometric series ?

The denominator is x^{n-1} + x^{n-2} + ... + x^0 = \frac{x^n - 1}{x - 1}

using the well worn sum for GPs, and the answer immediately follows.
 
  • #13
Curious3141 said:
Why can't one just use the sum for Geometric series ?

The denominator is x^{n-1} + x^{n-2} + ... + x^0 = \frac{x^n - 1}{x - 1}

using the well worn sum for GPs, and the answer immediately follows.
Indeed, you can just cancel the x^n on both sides. Invert to get:
\frac{x^n-1}{x-1}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}}
A well known fact.

PS: \sum_{i=1}^n x^{n-i}=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^{i}
 
Back
Top