I ANOVA and Linear Regression Resource

Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
Hello,

Can someone please let me know of a resource (book or other) that explains how to use ANOVA in linear regression? I didn't even know what ANOVA was until some days ago so I'm looking for something that explains it thoroughly with deductions. The resources I've read focused solely on giving a formula on how to use the method, and no explanation on how to deduce the method... Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're willing to go for the full Lean Six Sigma Black Belt training, you will escape knowing more about analysis of mean and many other statistical tools than you will likely ever need.
Short of that, I would suggest getting "Minitab" and go through their exercises:
https://support.minitab.com/en-us/m...ow-to/one-way-anova/before-you-start/example/

There is a free trial version - which may be sufficient for running the ANOVA exercises. Then the tool itself is about $1600.
http://www.minitab.com/en-us/products/minitab/pricing/
 
A book that I liked was "Applied Regression Analysis" by Norman Draper and Harry Smith.

Another good one that concentrates on the connections between regression, ANOVA, and other statistical methods is "Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods" by David Kleinbaum and Lawrence Kupper.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top