Collisions between a particle and the corresponding antiparticle are just like any other reaction -- it takes place provided there is sufficient energy, and provided that no conservation law is violated. It's not true that "all" of their rest mass gets released as energy. Part of if goes into creation of other particles, and part of it goes into supplying these new particles with kinetic energy.
For more than 25 years the Tevatron at Fermilab collided protons and antiprotons. Here's a picture of a typical collision showing the shower of particles it produced.
#3
dauto
1,948
201
When a particle reacts with its own anti-particle, all the conserved quantities (electric charge is just one of them) cancel out so it is possible (but not required) that all the particles energy gets transferred to a number of photons. These photons will be absorbed by the surrounding matter heating it up.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
The wavefunction of an atomic orbital like ##p_x##-orbital is generally in the form ##f(\theta)e^{i\phi}## so the probability of the presence of particle is identical at all the directional angles ##\phi##. However, it is dumbbell-shape along the x direction which shows ##\phi##-dependence!