Antisymmetry of the electromagnetic field tensor

  • #1
shinobi20
257
17
Homework Statement:
Show that the electromagnetic field tensor is antisymmetric from the fact that ##p_\mu p_\nu F^{\mu \nu} = 0##.
Relevant Equations:
##p_\mu p_\nu F^{\mu \nu} = 0##
where ##p_\mu## is the 4-momentum and ##F^{\mu \nu}## is the EM field tensor
1.png

I am trying to answer exercise 5 but I am not sure I understand what the hint is implying, differentiate with respect to ##p_\alpha## and ##p_\beta##, I have done this but nothing is clicking. Also, what is the relevance of the hint "the constraint ##p^\alpha p_\alpha = m^2c^2## can be ignored ..."? Please help me clarify what the author wants me to think or do in accordance to the hint.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mitochan
294
133
##p_\mu p_\nu## is a symmetric tensor.
 
  • #3
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2,597
761
try writing [itex] F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] as a sum of symmetric and anti symmetric pieces then do the contraction with the [itex] p^\alpha[/itex] to show that the components cancel.

or try writing [itex] F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] using its definition in terms of [itex] A^\mu[/itex] and [itex] \partial^\nu[/itex]
 
  • #4
shinobi20
257
17
try writing [itex] F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] as a sum of symmetric and anti symmetric pieces then do the contraction with the [itex] p^\alpha[/itex] to show that the components cancel.

or try writing [itex] F^{\mu\nu}[/itex] using its definition in terms of [itex] A^\mu[/itex] and [itex] \partial^\nu[/itex]

I cannot figure out what you want me to do, but then I want to follow the hint given in OP.

My attempt, differentiating with respect to ##p_\alpha## and ##p_\beta##,

##\delta^\mu_\alpha p_\nu F^{\mu\nu} + p_\mu \delta^\nu_\alpha F^{\mu\nu} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad p_\nu F^{\alpha\nu} + p_\mu F^{\mu\alpha} = 0##

##\delta^\mu_\beta p_\nu F^{\mu\nu} + p_\mu \delta^\nu_\beta F^{\mu\nu} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad p_\nu F^{\beta\nu} + p_\mu F^{\mu\beta} = 0##

Multiplying both sides of the first equation by ##p^\mu##

##p^\mu p_\nu F^{\alpha\nu} + m^2 c^2 F^{\mu\alpha} = 0##

Multiplying both sides of the second equation by ##p^\nu##

##m^2 c^2 F^{\beta\nu} + p^\nu p_\mu F^{\mu\beta} = 0##

From these last two equations, I think there are only a few steps before I get the answer, but I cannot see it.

**I may be wrong by multiplying ##p^\nu## in the second equation, maybe it should also be ##p^\mu##, but the flow is as above.
 
  • #5
mitochan
294
133
(Further to post #2)
[tex]p_\mu p_\nu F^{\mu \nu}=p_\mu p_\nu (S^{\mu \nu}+A^{\mu \nu})[/tex]
where S is symmetric and A is anti-symmetric components of F.
Contract of symmetric tensor, here ##p_\mu p_\nu##, and anti-symmetric tensor, here ##A^{\mu \nu}##, is always zero.
[tex]p_\mu p_\nu A^{\mu \nu}=0[/tex]
This and
[tex]p_\mu p_\nu F^{\mu \nu}=0[/tex]
give
[tex]p_\mu p_\nu S^{\mu \nu}=0[/tex]
[tex]S^{\mu \nu}=0[/tex]
So ##F^{\mu \nu}## has only anti-symmetric components.
 
  • #6
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,818
2,465
I cannot figure out what you want me to do, but then I want to follow the hint given in OP.

My attempt, differentiating with respect to ##p_\alpha## and ##p_\beta##,

##\delta^\mu_\alpha p_\nu F^{\mu\nu} + p_\mu \delta^\nu_\alpha F^{\mu\nu} = 0 \quad \rightarrow \quad p_\nu F^{\alpha\nu} + p_\mu F^{\mu\alpha} = 0##
Try differentiating this result with respect to ##p_\beta##.
 
  • #7
shinobi20
257
17
Try differentiating this result with respect to ##p_\beta##.
😑😑😑
I don't consider myself stupid, but there are some days where I think I am one. It is like having a snake in front of me but still don't notice it. The hint given in OP is very clear, you just restated what it said but in a different way.

What is your advice on this? Is this just a physics thing that can be improved within physics? o_O
 
Last edited:
  • #8
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,818
2,465
😑😑😑
I don't consider myself stupid, but there are some days where I think I am one. It is like having a snake in front of me but still don't notice it. The hint given in OP is very clear, you just restated what it said but in a different way.

What is your advice on this? Is this just a physics thing that can be improved within physics? o_O
I think everyone has had moments like these, and then we feel like idiots for not seeing what's right in front of us. The best advice I can give is to be aware of the possibility of tunnel vision so you can break out of a rut sooner rather than later.
 

Suggested for: Antisymmetry of the electromagnetic field tensor

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
596
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
505
Replies
2
Views
638
  • Last Post
Replies
28
Views
739
Replies
2
Views
459
Replies
1
Views
536
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
644
Replies
9
Views
733
Replies
2
Views
382
Top