Any group of 3 elements is isomorphic to Z3

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Group
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that any group with three elements is isomorphic to Z3. Participants are exploring the properties of group isomorphisms and the specific case of groups with three elements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss defining an isomorphism between a group of three elements and Z3, questioning how to establish the mapping and whether it satisfies the necessary properties of being one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the conditions for an isomorphism, with some participants questioning the validity of their assumptions and others attempting to clarify the implications of those assumptions. Guidance on proving one-to-one properties has been suggested, but no consensus has been reached on the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and implications of isomorphisms, particularly in the context of finite groups, and are considering the constraints of their assumptions in the proof process.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that any group with three elements is isomorphic to [tex]Z_{3}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let G be the group of three elements
We have an isomorphism if given c:G--->[tex]Z_{3}[/tex],
if c is one-to -one and onto and c(ab)=c(a)c(b)

First, we check one-to-one
We want c(a)=c(b) to imply a=b
My problem here is how to define c(a), c(b).
Onto:
We want c(a)=x and want to solve for a?
c(ab):
Same problem with not knowing what c(ab) is
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a group of three elements {e,a,b}. Since the order of every element must be three, we have that b=a². Thus the group is {e,a,a²}.

Define the map G --> Z3 by
e ---> 0
a ---> 1
b ---> 2

It is easily checked that this is indeed an iso.
 
So c(a)=c(b)
c(a)=1
c(b)=2
1=2 not true, but that means it's not an isomorphism
 
Uh what? c(a) doesn't equal c(b)? does it?
 
I thought for the one to one part, you assume c(a)=c(b)
 
Yes... never mind...
 
but I assumed that but that amounts to 1=2. How does that work?
 
You assumed that c(a)=c(b), and from that assimption followed that 1=2. So your assumption is wrong, and thus [tex]c(a)\neq c(b)[/tex]
 
Then I guess I don't see how to show 1-1

onto
y=c(x)
Do I just take any element, say a
y=c(a)=1
y=1, but we want to solve for x I thought

c(a)c(b)
1*2
2=c(ab)
 
  • #10
You show 1-1 by a simple proof by contradiction. I'm sorry, but a math major really should be able to do such a thing...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K