Show (H,+) is isomorphic to (C,+)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the structure (H,+) is isomorphic to (C,+), with a focus on the set M defined as a collection of 2x2 matrices involving real numbers. Participants are exploring concepts from group theory and binary operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to define a function f from M to C and are discussing the properties of this function, including whether it is one-to-one and onto. There are questions about the definitions of the elements of M and the operations involved. Some participants express confusion regarding the homomorphism property and the interpretation of the operations on matrices.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with various interpretations of the problem, and some participants are providing clarifications on the definitions and properties of the elements involved. Guidance has been offered regarding the proof of the homomorphism and the conditions for the function to be one-to-one and onto, although consensus on these points has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the notation and definitions, particularly the relationship between M and (H,+). There is also mention of a typo in the original post that may have contributed to misunderstandings.

HaLAA
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let, M={ (a -b) (b a):a,b∈ℝ}, show (H,+) is isomorphic as a binary structure to (C,+)

Homework Equations


Isomorphism, Group Theory, Binary Operation

The Attempt at a Solution



Let a,b,c,d∈ℝ
Define f : M→ℂ by f( (a -b) (b a) ) = a+bi

1-1:
Suppose f( (a -b) (b a) )= f( (c -d) (d c)), then a+bi =c+di, thus a=c and b=d, thus f is one to one.

Onto:
Let a+bi∈ℂ , then (a -b) (b a)∈M, so f((a -b) (b a))=a+bi, thus f is onto.

Homomorphic:

f((a -b) (b a) + (c -d ) (d c)))
=f( ((a+c) -(b+d)) ((b+d) -(a+c)))
= (a+c)+(b+d)i
= f((a -b) (b a)) +f((c -d) (d c))

I don't think I show f: M→ℂ is 1-1 and onto correctly because my instructor didn't talk about them to much, can any show me how show f: M→ℂ is 1-1 and onto? thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you define M but the title has (H,+) so I'm a bit confused. is the set M & then when you add the operation it becomes the group (H,+)? & when you say the elements of M are (a - b)*(b*a) do you mean that's ordinary multiplication & subtraction in ℝ? I wonder because I can't get that f is a homomorphism. I get
f( (a-b)(ba) ) + f( (c-d)(dc) ) = (a+bi) + (c+di) = (a+c) + (b+d)i = f( [(a+c) - (b+d)](b+d)(a+c) ) which I don't think equals f( (a-b)(ba) + (c-d)(dc) ) but maybe I'm missing something.

for 1-1 I think you missed a step. you got a+bi = c+di but before that I think you need to say (a-c) + (b-d)i = 0, then a-c=0 & b-d=0. an equivalent way is to start with a+bi ≠ c+di (etc) & conclude that f( (a-b)*(b*a) ) ≠ f( (c-d)*(d*c) )

for onto you got a+bi, & since a & b are real numbers, there is an element (a-b)*(b*a) in M such that f( (a-b)*(b*a) ) = a+bi. that is if I understood M correctly.
 
fourier jr said:
you define M but the title has (H,+) so I'm a bit confused. is the set M & then when you add the operation it becomes the group (H,+)? & when you say the elements of M are (a - b)*(b*a) do you mean that's ordinary multiplication & subtraction in ℝ? I wonder because I can't get that f is a homomorphism. I get
f( (a-b)(ba) ) + f( (c-d)(dc) ) = (a+bi) + (c+di) = (a+c) + (b+d)i = f( [(a+c) - (b+d)](b+d)(a+c) ) which I don't think equals f( (a-b)(ba) + (c-d)(dc) ) but maybe I'm missing something.

for 1-1 I think you missed a step. you got a+bi = c+di but before that I think you need to say (a-c) + (b-d)i = 0, then a-c=0 & b-d=0. an equivalent way is to start with a+bi ≠ c+di (etc) & conclude that f( (a-b)*(b*a) ) ≠ f( (c-d)*(d*c) )

for onto you got a+bi, & since a & b are real numbers, there is an element (a-b)*(b*a) in M such that f( (a-b)*(b*a) ) = a+bi. that is if I understood M correctly.
That H is a typo, and M is a 2 by 2 matrix that row one is a and -b, row 2 is b and a
 
wow I was really missing something... it makes a lot more sense now especially the homomorphism proof. i think what i said before still applies though if you replace everything with matrices.
 
fourier jr said:
wow I was really missing something... it makes a lot more sense now especially the homomorphism proof. i think what i said before still applies though if you replace everything with matrices.
Can you show me where I did indirect? I don't quite follow your word. Thanks
 
everything was ok I only misunderstood what the elements of M were. I would only add that if a+bi = c+di then (a-c) + (b-d)i = 0 then a-c=0 & b-d=0 to get that a=c & b=d, and also that if you're given a+bi in ℂ it is possible to find an element ## \Big( \begin{matrix} a & -b \\ b & a \end{matrix}\Big)## in M such that ## f\Big( \begin{matrix} a & -b \\ b & a \end{matrix}\Big) = a+bi##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K