Any help understanding this Lemma is Appreciated

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mining_Engr
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
Mining_Engr
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The lemma and proof are attached, how does the hypothesis imply that ∫h(u)*p(u)du = 0. This is where I am hung up. I don't see how the hypothesis implies this, please help!

Thanks in advance,

Mining_Engr
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
p(u) is a polynomial, say
[tex]p(u) = \sum_{i=0}^n \alpha_i u^i[/tex]

then
[tex]\int h(u) p(u) du = \int h(u) \sum_{i=0}^n \alpha_i u^i du = \sum_{i=0}^n \alpha_i \int h(u) u^i du[/tex]
and all those integrals at the end are zero so the whole sum is zero