Any particle,(with mass), get closer to C than the electron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmatejka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether any particle with mass can approach the speed of light (C) more closely than an electron. It is established that while electrons can reach high speeds, neutrinos, which have a much smaller mass, can travel faster for a given amount of energy. The conversation also touches on the potential of other particles, like protons and hypothetical gravitons, but emphasizes that neutrinos are the key example of particles with mass that can exceed the speed of electrons. Ultimately, the consensus is that for a given energy input, neutrinos can achieve higher velocities than electrons. This highlights the relationship between mass, energy, and speed in particle physics.
jmatejka
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
Any particle,(with mass), get closer to "C" than the electron?

I thought about this the other day, the question is exactly as stated in the title. Anything, with mass, able to get closer to the speed of light,(in a vacuum), than the electron can? Positron has same mass, same relativistic velocity potential?

Obviously Cherenkov radiation is a unique example where the electron exceeds the speed of light in a given mediuim. But my question is "in a vacuum".

Thanks, John
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Any particle with mass can get arbitrarily close to the speed of light - it's a matter of putting in enough energy.
 


Vanadium 50 said:
Any particle with mass can get arbitrarily close to the speed of light - it's a matter of putting in enough energy.

I guess my question is, for a given amount of energy, does anything get closer to "C" than the electron. Is the electron the fastest, or perhaps have the lowest mass of any particle with "mass"?

What holds the velocity record for a particle with mass, the electron?
 
Last edited:


jmatejka said:
I guess my question is, for a given amount of energy, does anything get closer to "C" than the electron. Is the electron the fastest, or perhaps have the lowest mass of any particle with "mass"?

What holds the velocity record for a particle with mass, the electron?

As pointed out by Vanadium 50 its a matter of putting in enough energy.It is relatively easy to do this with charged particles for example in accelerators.What holds the velocity record?Interesting question and I don't know the answer but my guess is that it is electrons,or perhaps, protons.Hopefully someone will come in with an answer.
 


jmatejka said:
I guess my question is, for a given amount of energy, does anything get closer to "C" than the electron. Is the electron the fastest, or perhaps have the lowest mass of any particle with "mass"?

No, there are neutrinos with much smaller mass (if any) so for a given amount of energy a neutrino will be faster.

Also gravitons may have some small mass but think first of neutrino - they exist for sure.
 


Bob_for_short said:
No, there are neutrinos with much smaller mass (if any) so for a given amount of energy a neutrino will be faster.

Also gravitons may have some small mass but think first of neutrino - they exist for sure.

Bingo! just what I was looking for, Thanks!
 

Thread 'Maxwell stress tensor'

This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
View full post »
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electromagnetic mass of an electron
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Dimensional analysis in the formula for gyration frequency
Replies
6
Views
1K
Electron speed and acceleration in an electric field
Replies
9
Views
5K
How do we know the mass of an electron?
Replies
28
Views
4K
Is it possible that an electron can have a negative mass?
Replies
13
Views
4K
I Evaporating black holes and conservation of charges?
Replies
14
Views
3K
I Why do we still say “the speed of light” instead of “c”?
Replies
12
Views
2K
B How do alpha particles interact with electrons in gold foil experiments?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Hawking Radiation: Can Particles Appear with Relativistic Velocities?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Is the Near Integer Muon to Electron Mass Ratio a Coincidence or Significant?
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top